Friday February 03, 2006
EMMA vs. Cobertura for Code Coverage I'm looking to add code-coverage reporting to AppFuse. The two open source libraries I know of to do this are EMMA (CPL) and Cobertura (ASL). Which one is the better library to use? Both projects seem to be actively developed - and there are AppFuse HowTos for both, so the decision making process is a bit difficult.
Any insights into why one tool (or project) is better than the other is appreciated. Posted in Java at Feb 03 2006, 05:16:35 PM MST 10 Comments
Matt Raible is a Web Architect who enjoys developing applications with open source technologies. Contact me for rates.
Search This Site
Recent Entries
- What's Next
- Jack's Mohawk
- LinkedIn Cuts 10% (a.k.a. The Journey is Over)
- Happy Birthday Abbie!
- Moving from Spring's XML to Annotations in AppFuse
- Free Maven Training in New Orleans on Election Day
- AppFuse Light ยป AppFuse, Maven Archetypes and Shared Web Assets
- Great Weekend in Montana
- Colorado Software Summit 2008 Wrapup
- RESTful Web Applications with Subbu Allamaraju