Matt RaibleMatt Raible is a writer with a passion for software. Connect with him on LinkedIn.

The Angular Mini-Book The Angular Mini-Book is a guide to getting started with Angular. You'll learn how to develop a bare-bones application, test it, and deploy it. Then you'll move on to adding Bootstrap, Angular Material, continuous integration, and authentication.

Spring Boot is a popular framework for building REST APIs. You'll learn how to integrate Angular with Spring Boot and use security best practices like HTTPS and a content security policy.

For book updates, follow @angular_book on Twitter.

The JHipster Mini-Book The JHipster Mini-Book is a guide to getting started with hip technologies today: Angular, Bootstrap, and Spring Boot. All of these frameworks are wrapped up in an easy-to-use project called JHipster.

This book shows you how to build an app with JHipster, and guides you through the plethora of tools, techniques and options you can use. Furthermore, it explains the UI and API building blocks so you understand the underpinnings of your great application.

For book updates, follow @jhipster-book on Twitter.

10+ YEARS


Over 10 years ago, I wrote my first blog post. Since then, I've authored books, had kids, traveled the world, found Trish and blogged about it all.
You searched this site for "jsf". 312 entries found.

You can also try this same search on Google.

[DJUG] JMS and Spring

Tonight's DJUG should be a fun one. First, I hope to learn some JMS tips and tricks from Chris Huston then I'm doing a presentation on Spring. I asked the group what they wanted to know about Spring last week and I got a wide range of answers. There should be a good mix of newbies and experienced Spring users. I'll give you a link to my presentation, but I have to warn you that there's not much there. I tend to show a lot of code in and do demos when I present, so my presentations tend to be kinda thin. My two goals for tonight are 1) keep it under an hour so we can all get to the bar and 2) inspire Spring-mania among the crowd.

   Download Presentation »

Posted in Java at Dec 08 2004, 05:00:51 PM MST 6 Comments

[ANN] AppFuse 1.7 Released

This release adds support for JSF/MyFaces and Tapestry as web framework options. AppGen has been updated to work with both of these frameworks and I added new tutorials as well. You can read about my integration experience in a previous post.

After I released AppFuse 1.6.1, I knew the only way I was going to get Tapestry and JSF support done was if I stayed close to the code and started the next release. I never envisioned developing the Tapestry and JSF versions of AppFuse at the same time, but it turned out to be very efficient. If you want a comparison of all the different web frameworks in AppFuse (and AppFuse Light) - you can checkout my Comparing Web Frameworks presentation. If you want more in-depth coverage - it'll be in the next Chapter of Spring Live. ;-)

If you find any issues, let us know.

Posted in Java at Dec 08 2004, 11:30:25 AM MST 9 Comments

Integrating JSF and Tapestry into AppFuse

Well it looks like I accomplished my goal for the year: integrate Spring MVC, WebWork, Tapestry and JSF into AppFuse. I decided to integrate JSF and Tapestry at the same time so I could get a good feel for their differences. Also, I figured there would be a lot of similarities I could re-use between the two. I found this to be a great idea. Often I'd use the first framework as a template and the second would go much quicker. It turned out to be a good strategy because I often found bugs in the first while working on the second. I really enjoyed developing with both JSF and Tapestry - here's my notes from my development marathon over the last week:

Tapestry

  • For Tapestry, I created a patched version of the 3.0 source. I did this because I wanted some non-standard things, like friendly URLs, a global properties file and a popup calendar that works with IE/XHTML. The Tapestry Community was gracious enough to supply the source - so I didn't have to do much patching myself.
  • Pure HTML, like Tapestry has, is ssoooooo much nicer to work with. The syntax highlighting in HomeSite is fully functional again! I've been an HTML developer since 94 and I felt like it was 97 all over again - when we didn't write apps, just static HTML.
  • Overriding the default Tapestry ValidationDelegate was pretty easy - and there's even an example in Tapestry in Action. I was able to add asterisks for required fields and error messages next to the fields fairly easily. Erik Hatcher also hooked me up with a Label component for non-validating fields.
  • For the contrib:Table component, you can easily i18n column headings by using "keyName:propertyName" as the column value. However, if your keyName has a period in it (i.e. user.username), you can't override the ValueBlock b/c user.username is an invalid OGNL expression. I patched Tapestry to solve this.
  • The ability to use <span key="keyName"/> to render i18n keys is awesome. So simple.
  • Tapestry has a very rich validation framework that requires virtually no configuration. No setting up your resource bundle, etc. It just works. Client-side too.
  • It would be nice to show all the client-side validation errors in a single dialog instead of one-at-a-time (WebWork does this too).

JSF/MyFaces

  • I like how you don't have to create mappings - just link to the .jsp with an .html extension.
  • For some reason, when I save a user and server-side validation occurs, the user's username and roles disappear. Good thing client-side validation is available.
  • It was easy to override the Labels to add asterisks thanks to some code from David Geary on the MyFaces mailing list. In order to make it work, I had to ditch my HTML <table> and use an <h:panelGrid>. Now my JSP is Tag Soup. I think JSF is going to have to ditch JSP if they want to get anywhere. Hopefully JSF will soon support HTML templates like Tapestry and parse them with a Servlet Filter or something.
  • It's unfortunate that I have to specify a "styleClass" attribute on all my <h:message> tags - I'd like to just set a default for these tags (others too).
  • I ditched JSF's message setting and opted for setting my own List of messages in the session and then grabbing them out with a MessageFilter. This was so much easier to implement than the standard JSF message setting stuff.
  • I'd rather not have to specify <f:loadBundle> at the top of each page. It's going to be the same for my whole app - it'd be nice to set a default bundle and variable name that all tags could access.
  • It was quite a bit easier to integrate JSF into AppFuse than Tapestry. This was mainly due to the fact that I could re-use a lot of the JSP code, as well as the WebWork Actions are pretty close to the JSF Managed Beans.
  • Spring Rocks - it never caused any issues with either framework. I just wish MyFaces wouldn't warn that it can't find a variable that it's already found. I had to turn logging down to FATAL so I don't get any meaningless messages from MyFaces.
  • With JSF, why do I have to specify the supported locales in faces-config.xml? Why can't it look up the available bundles like JSTL with Spring/WebWork/Struts does?

So after all of this, which is my favorite? Unfortunately, there is no clear winner. They're both pretty cool, but not that much better than Struts, Spring or WebWork. In reality, I like them all, that's why they're all integrated into AppFuse! ;-)

Update: I forgot to mention that I was very pleased with the latest version of Canoo's WebTest. It now uses HtmlUnit at its core and its JavaScript support has vastly improved. I wouldn't have been able to do integration testing on the JSF version without this (updated) library. Not only did it work great, but it found XHTML issues in my code - that rocks! The JSF and Tapestry versions of AppFuse are the only ones that run Canoo tests with JavaScript turned on. This is mainly because the old tests worked fine w/o JavaScript and I didn't want to break them.

Posted in Java at Dec 08 2004, 04:10:27 AM MST 5 Comments

The Future of the J2EE Web Tier

There's a chat in a few hours on the future of the J2EE Web Tier. I'll be sitting in and hoping to learn something. The alignment of the JSP EL and JSF EL will be nice - but we really want HTML Templating for JSF - like Tapestry. After developing Tag Soup JSPs for JSF and HTML-editor-friendly pages for Tapestry, I can say there's definitely a big difference. Tapestry templates are much easier to read. However, if you have an existing JSP app, you can migrate to JSF easier.

Posted in Java at Dec 07 2004, 09:30:02 AM MST 7 Comments

AppFuse - Tapestry and JSF Support in CVS

I've finished the coding part of adding JSF (MyFaces) and Tapestry support to AppFuse. This weekend was spent knee-deep in XDoclet templates - updating AppGen for these two frameworks. I still need to write up a couple of blog posts about integration and update the tutorials, but the hard part is done.

If you're an early-adopter, feel free to check it out. The QuickStart Guide should help you get the source from CVS. I hope to release version 1.7 later this week.

Posted in Java at Dec 06 2004, 05:43:00 PM MST 2 Comments

Edit Screens with JSF

I'm working with JSF this morning and I'm finding one thing particularly annoying. I'm working on a simple master/detail screen and I'm tweaking the detail screen to fit my needs. It's just a <form> with some form elements. I change something, run "ant deploy-web" and hit "refresh" to see my updated page. Since everything in JSF is a post, I get prompted to re-submit the form. Fine, I agree - then I'm returned to the list screen. Argggh - why can't I just view the form again?! This might just be a MyFaces nuance, I'm not sure. Anyone know of a workaround?

Wanna see the bug/feature in action? Go to http://demo.raibledesigns.com/equinox-jsf/userList.html, click on a row - and after the edit screen displays, hit refresh on your browser. In an ideal world, you'd see the form again, but nope - you get the list instead.

Posted in Java at Nov 28 2004, 10:02:25 AM MST 9 Comments

AppFuse Tapestry/JSF Status

There's 3 phases of adding a new web framework to AppFuse. The first phase is integration and configuration. This is the fun part and involves adding JARs and configuring everything so the framework actually works. At the end of this phase, I'm usually pretty enthusiastic about my progress and think I can finish the whole project in a few more days. Then comes the "features" phase, when I start coding AppFuse features with the framework. This part always takes wwaaaaaaayyyy longer than I anticipate. This is the part where I realise previously done things (from other framework implementations) won't work and I have a long road ahead of me. For instance, with Tapestry and JSF, I have to figure out how to do the following: Country drop-down based on locale (currently a JSP tag, so should work with JSF), multi-select checkbox, and placing an asterisk next to required fields.

The asterisk isn't too hard if you do it the "WebWork way" - where you simply specify required="true" on JSP Tag. However, I'd prefer to have it read from the validation engine, so this will probably take some digging on how to do it with JSF/Tapestry. For the country drop-down, I'll probably have to create a Tapestry Component. I believe both frameworks have a multi-select checkbox component. After working with Tapestry's contrib:Table component for a few hours, I miss the Display Tag. The contrib:Table works, but it's a LOT more difficult to configure than the Display Tag. It also blows up if you click the column headings too many times. Also, it doesn't have any exporting features like the Display Tag. Sure, it might not need them, but a lot of folks have come to rely on these and it's a handy feature. Furthermore, another unfortunate thing I found in Tapestry this morning is it doesn't seem to read the locale from the request. So if you change your browser's language, it won't switch the language. You actually have to logout and kill the session to switch the locale. Bummer.

My main problem with the 2nd phase of the project is choosing whether to "do it right" or "get it done". I often start out just trying to get shit done, but end up being a perfectionist and trying to do it right. This phase took a couple of weeks to get through with WebWork. Ugh - I'd rather just get this stuff done, but I don't think it's gonna happen. I think I'll be working on the "features" phase for quite some time. Oh well, at least I'll learn the ins and outs of each framework.

The final "finishing up" phase is one of the best. It's when everything works and I write the installation scripts and tutorials. This is slightly painful b/c there's nothing new to discover, but it's also nice because there's nothing new to learn or get tripped up on.

AppFuse 1.7 estimated release date? I was hoping for the next couple of weeks, but I'd better stick with the end of the year. I'm sure there's going to be a fair amount of banging my head against the wall in the next few weeks.

Posted in Java at Nov 25 2004, 08:52:13 AM MST 1 Comment

Studying vs. Doing

My parents are in town for this next week and I expect to relax most of the week, but also squeeze a few hours in each day for Java. I'll probably do a bit of work for clients, but I expect to spend most of my time with Tapestry and JSF. I have to write a chapter that includes these frameworks in 3 weeks and I hope to integrate them into AppFuse by the end of the year.

Last night, I started thinking - I can use this week for 2 things: reading or doing. I could finish reading Tapestry In Action and get a good start on Core JSF. Or I could make the leap and begin implementing them in AppFuse. The latter sounds like more fun. Of course, the books should serve as good reference guides when I need help.

Posted in Java at Nov 20 2004, 02:14:21 PM MST 1 Comment

Tapestry by Example with Erik Hatcher

It's Saturday morning and I plan on learning more about Tapestry this morning. There's pretty light attendence in the room. Too bad - I bet if it was a JSF talk, the room would be packed. In this talk, we're actually going to build a real application on-the-fly.

Why another web framework?

  • HTML should be HTML
  • JavaScript Embraced
  • Reusable components
  • Free developer from dealing with plumbing
    • Request/Response
    • Session/Application Scope
    • URL Mappings (nice, but leads to ugly URLs)
  • Event handler driven
  • Asset handling
  • Line-precise error reporting

Erik says its one of the few frameworks that embraces JavaScript so much. I dig this b/c I think JavaScript is important for web development. Look at what the GMail guys have done with JavaScript. It'd be wicked cool to have this sort of thing open-sourced so we could all create GMail-type interfaces.

Dirty Laundry

  • Heavy Duty - can be overkill for small/simple app
  • Potentially steep learning curve. More of an un-learning curve. The Servlet API isn't in your face - so all that knowledge is useless.
  • Not widely accepted - managers haven't heard of it
  • Some awkward conventions (i.e. abstract classes)
    • and some non-intuitive necessary tricks
  • Unit testing tough - do you unit test your swing app's listener methods?
    • Tapestry Test Assist should solve this problem
    • Howard's caught the TDD bug, so this should get better
  • Lousy URLs - there's a patch on the wiki to fix this
    • Tough to do hit/stat tracking
    J2EE declarative security
  • Example applications

Workbench Demo - DatePicker component does do i18n (very cool!). Client-side validation does one-field at a time, like WebWork does. I prefer the "all messages in one pop-up" approach that Commons Validator has. Pallete component looks very cool - you can move and re-order items from a multi-select on the left to a multi-select on the right. Chart component looks pretty cool - you can generate graphs very easily. Unfortunately, it's not part of Tapestry, but you can see how to do it in the Workbench app. If you want to see an online version of the workbench, I have it setup on my server.

Repositories for components: Tacos, Tassel, T-Deli and a few mentioned on the wiki.

To bring a component to life, you simply add a "jwcid" to an HTML tag. You can specify initial values for page properties using <property-specification initial-value=""> tag in your template's .page file. The value is implicitly an OGNL expression, and you can define lists using "{'value1', 'value2', 'value3'}". This is great for prototyping before you have a backend or even a page class. To remove elements in a page, specify jwcid="$remove$" on an HTML element and it'll be removed at render time. The restriction is you can't have Tapestry components inside a $remove$ component.

If you don't want to use abstract methods (and hence classes) in your page class, you can use getProperty()/setProperty() methods. However, the recommended way is to use abstract methods.

Templates - two different types. You can put the @component stuff directly into your page - or you can use jwcid's and refer to a name that's defined as a <component> in your page-specification XML file. The Border component can be used to do page decoration like SiteMesh. You can use the Shell component to declare stylesheets/scripts on a per-page basis. This is something I do a fair amount, so it's nice to see it's built into Tapestry.

Internationalization - Resource bundles are component specific (one .properties per page). In a .page, you use <message-binding>. In a template (.html), you use attribute="message:key" or <span key="">. The "key" attribute can't be used on any ol' HTML element, only on the <span> tag. In .java, you use getMessage() and format(). You can also define a custom message source (i.e. read messages from a database). I'm impressed with how easy it is to do i18n in Tapestry. It's also cool that i18n is built-in for templates. Just include a locale extension on your page and it'll be rendered for users with that locale. For example, home_fr.html will show up for users with the French Locale.

Engine - gets all requests. Visit class - POJO that acts as like an HttpSession. You can configure it in the .application file. You can talk to your "Visit" class in a template using "ognl:visit". To call methods on it, just use "ognl:visit.method". Majority of services originate in the Engine. Generally override createXXX methods. Engines can be pooled or created on a per-session basis.

If you override the createXXX methods in Engine, you change the behavior for:

  • message source
  • global and visit
  • property configuration
  • template and component sources

contrib:Table - to override use <tr jwcid="columnColumnValue@Block"> - where "column" is the name of the column. Using this, you can easily put links and such into a table cell. Built-in TableModel can be used to talk directly to a JDBC DataSource. The TableModel is smart in that it only brings back the rows it needs to display. Add an exclamation point to the beginning of a column name to turn off sorting for that column. i18n is built-in for headers - the name of the column is simply looked up as a key in the page's .properties file.

Exception handling - Bail out by throwing an ApplicationRuntimeException. This tosses you to the default exception page, which you can override and "pretty up".

Validation - it's robust, but it can only validate <input type="text">. Erik thinks that Tapestry's validation framework could be much simpler and easier to use.

Dynamic Templates - can implement a IDelegateSourceTemplate and pull templates from a database or content-management system. To register your new TemplateDelegate, you can just register an <extension> in the .application file and point it to your class.

Page Lifecycle - initialize(), PageRenderListener(), PageValidateListener(), PageDetachListener(). Can use an ExternalCallback and ICallback to set properties on one page from another. Callbacks look very cool and there's a lot of discussions about them on the mailing list. The VLib app has a fair amount of callback examples.

This was definitely a good Tapestry session - thanks Erik.

Posted in Java at Nov 13 2004, 12:53:59 PM MST 4 Comments

Can you base a web framework on another web framework?

It looks like the Struts guys are going to base Struts 2.0 on JSF (detailed proposal, wiki). It should be interesting to see a web framework developed on top of another web framework. Of course, it's been done before. The two things I really like in this proposal are 1) a built-in IoC container and 2) the security stuff (remember me, user registration). Here's the details from the proposal:

3.5 Service Provisioning APIs

Inversion of Control (IoC) containers (the techniques are also referred to as Dependency Injection) are becoming a popular mechanism for assembling the required services and logic of an application. If Struts included such a framework, it would provide a solid basis for building maintainable apps, as well as allowing the framework to configure itself using the same capabilities.

Rather than building such a container ourselves, we should seek to incorporate an existing one that is license-compatible and which can be integrated into the JSF managed beans facilities (so that value binding and method binding expressions can leverage the facilities of this container transparently). From my research so far, I like Spring's capabilities in this area the best, but am open to other suggestions.

3.6 Authentication and Authorization APIs

In order to support reasonably complete solutions for applications that wish to provide their own authentication and authorization services (as well as interact with container managed security), we need APIs available for performing user registration, implementing "remember me" features, and represent the results via a wrapped request (so that apps depending on getRemoteUser(), getUserPrincipal(), and isUserInRole() will still work). Using JDK 1.4 as a base platform would allow us to integrate mechanisms like JAAS. Other alternatives include plugins like SecurityFilter.

I added the emphsis on Spring. I'm all for this because 1) I'm on the JSF Expert Group (as of last week) and 2) it'd be nice to see JSF stretched, poked and prodded. IMO, JSF needs more "real-world" usage and the popularity of Struts will give it that. By "real-world" usage - I mean it needs to be used by developers that aren't cooped up in some cube with a fancy IDE. I also like the proposal because there's tons of Struts apps out there - and many of them might want to "upgrade". This means more (potential) work for me. Of course, I also plan on spending more time with Tapestry so I can offer client's an "educated" suggestion. BTW, the reason I joined the JSF EG is to be the "developer's voice" among the IDE Vendors. So if you'd like your voice to be heard - send me your suggestions, I'm all ears.

The question is - when will Shale be released? Of course, since it's open-source, the answer is "when it's ready". My guess is 1 year from today. I'm thinking of making AppFuse 2.0 use this new stuff. Of course, it'll have Tapestry and JSF options long before that.

If nothing else, the Shale proposal should motivate other web framework developers to highlight their roadmaps and what's new and cool on their horizons.

Posted in Java at Nov 08 2004, 08:59:01 AM MST 10 Comments