Raible Designs

Microsoft's Agenda at the Competitive Influentials Summit

They said I could blog everything about the conference I'm going to tomorrow, so let's see how far they're willing to go. A lot of folks have asked me what the agenda is, and until now - I've had no clue. However, today I was sent an e-mail and I'm happy to let y'all know what's going to happen. One thing I noticed is that the Word document's title was "Competitive Influentials Summit". Heh - I guess I'm an "influential" now.

I'm really looking forward to this event. I think we're really going to get wined and dined, and maybe even learn something. It'll be the first time in my life that someone will be picking me up from the airport with a "Raible" sign. I'm leaving at noon on Thursday to do a little St. Patty's day celebrating with my sister (it's her birthday), so I'll miss the "Open Source and Microsoft" session. Hopefully someone else will blog that so we see what they're thinking.

Spring MVC vs. WebWork Smackdown at OSCON

Matthew Porter and I are going to try something a bit different at this year's OSCON. Rather than just getting up in front of the crowd and spewing our technical know-how, we're actually going to make a go at providing some entertainment. I've been to a lot of conferences and I'm tired of just watching someone talk - I'd rather see a good presenter over a knowledgeable presenter. This has inspired our OSCON 2005 talk:

This presentation has a unique delivery style. Rather than one person doing a comparison, there are two presenters - each which is an expert in the framework they're defending. The presentation is delivered as a friendly comparison/debate, which hopes to add some humor in to make it fun for the audience.

Java web developers often have a difficult choice when choosing a web framework these days. There are currently more than 35 open-source Java web frameworks available. How do you which one to use for your project? This presentation picks two of the most popular frameworks, Spring MVC and WebWork and compares and contrasts their features. Topics will include:

1. View options - i.e. Velocity, JSP, HTML Templates (ala XMLC), etc.
2. Testability - How easy is it to unit test with JUnit, with examples
3. Type conversion - i.e. Date, Integer, etc.
4. Validation - How do do it, stengths and weaknesses
5. Tools Support
6. Strengths and Weaknesses

Now the pressure's on - we have to both teach and entertain the audience. Please feel free to post your experiences with Spring or WebWork and why you think one is better than the other.

Is Laszlo a waste of time?

According to Rife founder Geert Bevin, Laszlo ain't all it's cracked up to be:

It's a shame, I really had huge expectations about Laszlo and even tried to sell it to a customer. I'm glad that project was cancelled or I would be in deep trouble.

Under normal circumstances, I'd dismiss this as FUD, but Geert sounds like he did his homework on this one.

Simple Web Framework

You gotta admit, the Simple Web Framework does look interesting with all of the recent Ajax talk:

The Simple Web Framework (SWF) is an event based framework targeting Struts developers who want to build rich Web applications but do not want to migrate to JSF. The SWF is built upon the same Jakarta commons basis as Struts, but uses a different request processor (front controller.) The SWF event model supports form/submit style event posting, similar to VB.NET or JSF, as well as XmlHttpRequest based event posting with In place Page Updating (IPU) rather than page reloading, similar to the techniques underlying gMail. Read the SWF Overview for additional information.

My hope is that all web frameworks have some support for IPU by the end of the year. Then I won't have to build it into AppFuse.

Ajax webapps are cool, but non-javascript versions still needed

I think we can all probably learn a lesson from Google. I've heard that GMail is the "gold standard" for Ajax applications. If that's the case, then you should note that they've recently added a "basic HTML" link to the bottom of their pages. With this link, you can view your e-mail using the old way: Yahoo-style, no-JavaScript-needed. My guess is they added it because of demand, or simply to compete with other providers who have this feature. I think it's a good lesson though: use Ajax features in webapps where appropriate, but don't make JavaScript necessary to use your app.

A couple of Ajax features I've been thinking of developing:

• Saving forms with XMLHttpRequest: just display a success message at the top, and switch the "Cancel" button to "Done". Since the form's content doesn't change, this seems like a reasonable use of the technology.
• Switching out entire "content" <div> elements. Most of my apps have a <div id="content">, so it'd probably pretty easy to just replace that in response to button and link clicks. Of course, the hard part is having the requested server-side object load the view template, process it, and send back the content. This is probably more trouble than it's worth.

[TSSS] Days 1 and 2

I'm sitting in the EJB3 BOF right now. The room is packed, but it seems most folks are uninterested and the moderators are just talking amongst themselves. Seems like a good time to blog since this BOF doesn't interest me whatsoever. Yesterday, I arrived at 8:00, took a cab to the Imperial Palace (where we're staying) and then headed over to Caesar's for the conference. I registered, assured we could drink beer during the sessions, and attended the (rather dry) keynote. Hani has a good synopsis of this talk.

After the keynote, I went to Patrick and Jason's WebWork talk for about 10 minutes. I soon realized it was an intro to WebWork and left to try and learn something. I went to Craig McClanahan's talk on "The Development of Web Application APIs and Standards for Java." His talk was pretty good, and covered "de facto" versus "de jure" standards. De facto standards are ones that evolve from the community through widespread usage, whereas de jure standards are imposed on the community (like JSF). Again, Hani has the full scoop on this talk.

Next, I went to Dion and Ben's talk on Ajax applications. They talked about XHTML/CSS and how XMLHttpRequest makes rich client-side applications possible. I think the whole Ajax thing is pretty funny. It's something that's been available for several years and my guess is most folks just didn't know about it. I've been using XMLHttpRequest for a couple of years now, and it's interesting to see it become popular all of a sudden. It's quite nice actually. I've been writing HTML/JavaScript for over 10 years, so I find Ajax development pretty easy. I hope to add support for Ajax-type features in AppFuse before this summer.

I wonder when/if the community will realize the power XSL processing in the browser? Since we're all developing XHTML applications now, our pages are XML and we could easily start leveraging client-side XSLT to do some pretty cool stuff. With a client-side XSL sheet, you could do page decoration (like SiteMesh) just by adding one line to your pages. For example:

<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="styles/global.xsl"?>

The only problem with client-side XSLT is your pages have to be well-formed XML or everything bombs. With HTML, if you screw something up, chances are the browser will still render it correctly.

After the Ajax review, I had lunch and headed down to the Casino for some beers and gambling. I came back in time for Rod's "Why J2EE Projects Fail." It was a good talk, but there wasn't any revolutionary or new information provided. After his talk, I was motivated to learn more about Web Services Security, but instead opted for beers with Crazy Bob, JIRA Mike and Neon Dion. A couple of beers turned into several, and I found myself having dinner with the SourceBeat guys (Bill, Matt and Jim) a couple hours later. Steak and Lobster was my plate of choice and it tasted quite good. The rest of the night was spent gambling, drinking and harassing Pai Gow Poker dealers. We had breakfast around 2 and made it to bed by 3. Total cost of the trip so far: $300.

I slept in until noon today, after which Jim and I headed back to the conference for some lunch and afternoon sessions. Lunch was good and followed by Oracle demoing JDeveloper and coding EJB3 and JSF with it. I've often wondered about the cost of Oracle's ADF JSF implementation and actually got an answer from one of the attendees. I think he was an Oracle employee but he basically said you have to buy at least 1 copy of JDeveloper ($999) and you get a runtime license for ADF Faces as part of that. That sucks because Oracle's implementation looks like one of the most full-featured ones available. Why should I have to buy a tool I'll never use just to use ADF Faces?

After lunch, we attended Rod's "Advanced Spring Framework" and Craig's "JSF: Dead on Arrival or Raging Success". Rod's Spring presentation covered some advanced Spring features: autowiring, inner-beans, lists, instantiation choices, factory beans and template bean definitions. The presentation was good, and I was pleasantly surprised to find I knew most of the things he covered. Colin spoke about using JDK 5 annotations for transaction demarcation and Keith talked about Spring Web Flow. The Spring Web Flow stuff looks cool, especially since the other framework developers are listening and liking what they see. Craig even mentioned that he'll probably ditch what he's put together in Shale and use Spring Web Flow instead.

Craig's talk about JSF was rather boring, but most of these sessions are (mainly because there isn't a whole lot of new information). Craig did manage to pimp Java Studio Creator a bit. I find JSC demos to be quite funny since it hides so much code with code-folding. In the demo, Craig showed us a 10-line Java class that made JSF (and JSC) look like good stuff. Jim and I noticed code-folding was turned on and the class was actually 120 lines long! This is more of a problem with JSC then JSF IMO. The one nice thing about this talk was learning that a JSF 2.0 BOF is tonight. The main goal of the BOF is to see what the community wants in 2.0. I hope to attend and express a desire for HTML templates like Tapestry has.

Tonight kinda sucks because all the good BOFs (Spring, Tapestry and JSF 2.0) are at the same time (7:30). I'm hoping to hop around between them and get some good networking in. After the BOFs, OpenSymphony is hosting an open bar - so that should be a good time. Hopefully we can scare up a few free carbombs. For more blogs and coverage of the conference, see the TSSS 2005 blogger list.

Simplifying XmlHttpRequest with JSON-RPC

In my day job, we decided to use a little XMLHttpRequest lovin' to populate one drop-down from another. This is my review of JSON-RPC, an open source JavaScript library and servlet for simplifying XMLHttpRequest. I considered integrate Direct Web Remoting (DWR) as well, but its java.net site was down the day I needed it. I started out with JSON-RPC 0.7, which caused some conflicts with Commons Validator client-side validation. This was fixed in the 0.8 release. JSON-RPC takes a little more setup than I care for, but it's pretty easy nonetheless:

1. Download the 0.8 release from http://oss.metaparadigm.com/jsonrpc-dist/json-rpc-java-0.8.tar.gz.
2. Add the JAR to your project and the webapps/jsonrpc/jsonrpc.js to your projects' "scripts" folder. Include this file in your SiteMesh decorator or Tiles layout. If you're not using SiteMesh or Tiles, it's high time you started.
3. JSON-RPC currently requires that you register each class you want call methods on. In our project, I registered a Spring bean (LookupHelper) that's a singleton with references to Maps in the ServletContext. Then we used JavaScript functions to call JSON-PRC and look up units for a plant, and vice versa. I'm not going to put the LookupHelper class here - you'll have to trust its methods return a single String or a comma-separated list of Strings. To register this bean with JSON-RPC, I created an HttpSessionListener and configured it in web.xml.

   /**  * UserListener class used to add/remove session attributes when  * a user first logs in.  Mainly for JavaScript Remote Scripting stuff.  *  * @author Matt Raible  */ public class UserListener implements HttpSessionListener, HttpSessionAttributeListener {      private final Log log = LogFactory.getLog(UserListener.class);     public final static String BRIDGE_KEY = "JSONRPCBridge";     /**      * Initializes LookupHelper singleton with values needed for lookup      *      * @param event the HttpSessionEvent to grab session information from      */     public void sessionCreated(HttpSessionEvent event) {         // Find the JSONRPCBridge for this session or create one         // if it doesn't exist. Note the bridge must be named BRIDGE_KEY         // in the HttpSession for the JSONRPCServlet to find it.         HttpSession session = event.getSession();         JSONRPCBridge jsonBridge = new JSONRPCBridge();         jsonBridge.setDebug(true);         session.setAttribute(BRIDGE_KEY, jsonBridge);     }     /**      * Destroys LookupHelper      *      * @param event the HttpSessionEvent to grab session information from      */     public void sessionDestroyed(HttpSessionEvent event) {         if (event.getSession() != null) {             event.getSession().removeAttribute(BRIDGE_KEY);         }     }     public void attributeAdded(HttpSessionBindingEvent event) {         if (event.getName().equals(BRIDGE_KEY)) {             HttpSession session = event.getSession();             // register LookupHelper so we can call methods on it             ApplicationContext ctx =                     WebApplicationContextUtils                     .getWebApplicationContext(session.getServletContext());             // check for null so we don't have to initialize Spring in tests             if (ctx != null) {                 log.debug("Registering lookupHelper for XmlHttpRequest...");                 JSONRPCBridge jsonBridge =                     (JSONRPCBridge) session.getAttribute(BRIDGE_KEY);                 jsonBridge.registerObject("lookupHelper",                                           ctx.getBean("lookupHelper"));             }         }     }     public void attributeRemoved(HttpSessionBindingEvent event) {         // don't care     }     public void attributeReplaced(HttpSessionBindingEvent event) {         // same as attribute added         attributeAdded(event);     } }

4. After this setup was complete, I was able to add the following JavaScript to the bottom of my JSP. These are functions that our drop-downs call to populate each other, and keep their options in synch.

   <script type="text/javascript"> var jsonurl = "${ctx}/jsonrpc"; var jsonrpc = null; var unitDropDown = document.getElementById("equipmentName"); function filterUnits(plantDropDown) {     var plantName = plantDropDown.options[plantDropDown.selectedIndex].value;     if (plantName == "") {         reloadUnits("");         return;     }     try {         jsonrpc = new JSONRpcClient(jsonurl);     } catch(e) {         alert(e);     }     // Call a Java method on the server     var units = jsonrpc.lookupHelper.getUnitsForPlant(plantName);     setUnits(units); } function reloadUnits(value) {     if (value == "") {         try {             jsonrpc = new JSONRpcClient(jsonurl);         } catch(e) {             alert(e);         }         // Call a Java method on the server         var units = jsonrpc.lookupHelper.getAllUnits();         setUnits(units);     } } function setUnits(units) {     var unitArray = units.split(",");     unitDropDown.options.length = 1;  // keep "All" option     for (i=0; i < unitArray.length; i++) {         unitDropDown.options[unitDropDown.options.length] =             new Option(unitArray[i], unitArray[i]);     } } </script>

The hardest part of using JSON-RPC is setting it up. We only experienced minor issues with Commons Validator, but since the JSON-RPC 0.8 release - everything has worked great, on all browsers we need to support. The only thing I don't like about this library is that you have to register objects for each user's session. I briefly looked at DWR and it looks a little cleaner - especially b/c of its Spring integration. The next time we need XMLHttpRequest, we'll probably use DWR just to compare the two.

Fun with jWebUnit and Canoo WebTest

For the past few days, I've been messing around with jWebUnit and Canoo WebTest at my "day job". I say messing around because I've mainly been trying to overcome perceived bugs with both projects. I'm used to using Ant and both of these libraries "just work".

The problem I had with jWebUnit is that the setOption(selectName, optionLabel) didn't work for me. This turned out to be some sort of conflict with SiteMesh, and when I commented out the SiteMesh <filter-mapping>, everything worked as expected. This is quite strange since I use SiteMesh+jWebUnit with Equinox. I tried to reproduce the problem with Equinox by adding a <select> with <option> elements, but it all worked fine there. I'd blame it on Maven, but I was running my tests from IDEA. As a workaround, I subclassed SiteMesh's PageFilter and stopped processing when the user-agent.startsWith("httpunit"). This is very similar to the JCIFS and jWebUnit workaround we're using.

Before I figured out the jWebUnit/SiteMesh issue, I decided to try my favorite UI testing tool: WebTest. Since we're using Maven, I figured the Maven Canoo Webtest Plugin would be the way to go. This took me about a day to get working (so much for the ol' 10 minute test). Most of the problems where related to the fact that setting the properties didn't seem to have any effect. I ended up writing my web-tests.xml much like I would with Ant - with taskdefs and importing project.properties for the properties to take effect. Last night, after I couldn't get webtest to click a button, I decided to try the same XML file with Ant. I dropped it into AppFuse, changed a few settings and voila! - it all worked! "WTF?" I thought to myself. Turns out the Maven Plugin is from October 2004 and is based on build 543. I ended up rebuilding the plugin to build 733 and then everything worked fine. Here's the patch.

Now that I got them both working, I'm leaning towards using jWebUnit because I can use Java to get the last inserted id (for fullying CRUDing an object). With Canoo, I'd have to use our query interface, add a feature to sort by id (or somehow get the last record added), then click on it to edit the new record. To make matters worse, the API we're talking to right now let's us add records, but we can't fetch them back - no matter what we query by. We've tried both the web services interface and the EJB one with the same results.

Ahhh, the life of an enterprise developer - trying to make 3 systems talk to each other and all of them have broken (or non-existent APIs). For one system, we're actually going through their web interface with httpclient to do CRUD on records!

Hibernate vs. iBATIS

There's an interesting thread taking place on the iBATIS User Mailing List. The basic jist of the responses are: Hibernate works well when you control the data model, iBATIS works well when you need to integrate with an existing database. I've said this for a couple years now, and I still believe it. Furthermore, I've found that when working with iBATIS, I tend to know what's going on a lot more. After all, it's just SQL. From all the questions on the AppFuse mailing list, it seems like a lot of Hibernate users are constantly trying to get Hibernate to "work its magic" and handle all their relationships for them.

I wonder if newbies would be better of using iBATIS? Using iBATIS, there isn't a whole lot of magic, and you get full control over the SQL - which would likely be easier to understand. Maybe I should create a "newbie" version of AppFuse - where the frameworks uses are the easiest to learn or most documented. It'd probably be Struts+Spring+iBATIS, or maybe just Spring+iBATIS so I could sell more copies of Spring Live.

Rails is 8 times slower than Spring+Hibernate

Might as well start off this week by getting people's blood boiling. According to a comment on Dion's blog:

Having done extensive performance (scalability means different things to different people) testing on both Rails and a comparable Spring/Hibernate/JSP2 webapp (no one seems have have done any sort of benchmarking on Rails, or they simply don't care, I don't really know, but since benchmarking is what I do... ) I can say that Apache2/FastCGI/Rails is about... 8x slower than the comparable Tomcat/Spring/Hibernate/JSP2 solution. And that is with caching turned on in Rails (using Rails 0.9.5...)

Quite frankly, 62 req/s on a Dual Opteron with 4GB of RAM rendering a simple view with no DB access is too... damn slow.

Personally, I still think Rails looks like a great (and easy) way to develop webapps. I just wonder if there's some truth to the "can't scale" argument. I guess the best way to find out is for me to develop an application like AppFuse with Rails, and then hammer it (and AppFuse) with JMeter to see what kind of results I get.

On a sidenote, I wonder when Rails will hit the illustrious version 1.0? They released 0.1 last week - which is a bad version number for marketing. If it's as mature as folks claim, why not make the next release 1.0? That version number alone will likely allow developers to use it more in big companies.