Matt RaibleMatt Raible is a Web Developer and Java Champion. Connect with him on LinkedIn.

The Angular Mini-Book The Angular Mini-Book is a guide to getting started with Angular. You'll learn how to develop a bare-bones application, test it, and deploy it. Then you'll move on to adding Bootstrap, Angular Material, continuous integration, and authentication.

Spring Boot is a popular framework for building REST APIs. You'll learn how to integrate Angular with Spring Boot and use security best practices like HTTPS and a content security policy.

For book updates, follow @angular_book on Twitter.

The JHipster Mini-Book The JHipster Mini-Book is a guide to getting started with hip technologies today: Angular, Bootstrap, and Spring Boot. All of these frameworks are wrapped up in an easy-to-use project called JHipster.

This book shows you how to build an app with JHipster, and guides you through the plethora of tools, techniques and options you can use. Furthermore, it explains the UI and API building blocks so you understand the underpinnings of your great application.

For book updates, follow @jhipster-book on Twitter.

10+ YEARS


Over 10 years ago, I wrote my first blog post. Since then, I've authored books, had kids, traveled the world, found Trish and blogged about it all.

[DJUG] Testing and Handling Exceptions in the Web Tier

I'm attending Denver's JUG tonight, where Scott Davis is talking about Unit Testing the Web Tier. His opening slide says he's going to cover HttpUnit, Canoo WebTest and JMeter. I'm most interested in the JMeter stuff as I've been meaning to integrate it into AppFuse. I've used HttpUnit and it's a little verbose for me. I prefer using Canoo WebTest or jWebUnit over HttpUnit. On my current project, we're considering using jWebUnit or HttpUnit to act as a browser when interacting with a 3rd-party system.

All of these tools run functional tests - which are much different from unit tests. Unit tests usually tests the bricks, whereas functional tests test the building. For unit and functional tests to be truly effective, they must be:

  • Scriptable
  • Repeatable
  • Automated
  • Darn close to 100% coverage

The tools Scott is talking about tonight have passed his basic tests:

  • Can I learn it in 10 minutes?
  • Does it play nicely with my existing test environment?
  • Does it play nicely with my existing production environment?

I didn't take any notes about HttpUnit or Canoo WebTest because I didn't really learn anything new. Scott did do a nice job in his HttpUnit examples - he made it look a lot simpler than I've previously seen. I've used it HttpUnit before and it seems a bit verbose. I've always used jWebUnit, which simplifies HttpUnit's API.

JMeter allows you to do the same thing as HttpUnit and Canoo WebTest. It's a standalone GUI, for the complete non-programmer. It does not plug into Ant/JUnit and is mostly used for load testing. I thought it was exclusively used for load testing - and I think it has an Ant task. I could be wrong.

<sidenote>Scott uses Smultron for XML editing on his Mac.</sidenote>

The basic building block of JMeter is a "Thread Group". The Thread Group allows you to control the number of users/threads that run a particular test. You can test gets, posts, change the protocol and even upload files. For load testing, make sure and check "Retrieve all Embedded objects in HTML files". You have to view the "result windows" to view that your tests actually ran - there's no "green bar" feature.

I think JMeter has improved a lot since I last looked at it. Scott's overview and demonstration make it look very straight forward and easy to use. One guy asked if it's possible to see a a global view of all tests run. Scott thinks it's possible by adding a Listener to the Thread Group and creating a graph (one of the options). Scott is now showing a lot of the options in JMeter - there's a ton! It's almost overwhelming.

Next up is "Exceptional" Web Apps by Stephen A. Stelting, a senior Instructor and Author from Sun. His latest book is "Robust Java". Stephen has spent the last year and 1/2 figuring out how to make Java fail.

Objectives:

  • Describe the types of errors that occur in the web
  • Explain how exceptions and errors can be handled
  • Describe the web container response to exceptions
  • Present best practices to address web tier exceptions
  • Show how web frameworks handle exceptions

Payoff: As a result of this talk, you'll have a better understanding of how to use exceptions in Servlets and JSPs, improving the robustness of your webapps.

I'm a little skeptical at this point. I think most folks don't do exception handling in their webapps. I hope Stephen has some good tips and tricks for those of us who are familiar with handling exceptions. I wonder how he feels about Spring and its runtime exceptions?

There are two types of exceptions in the web tier: HTTP Errors and Java Exceptions. Standard HTTP Errors are handled by the web server. You can also send your own HTTP errors by calling HttpServletResponse.sendError(). If you're using response.sendError(), make sure and call it before you commit the output. The web.xml file allows you to specify errors and exceptions with the <error-page> element.

Servlets and Filters have similar exception behavior. Both declare exceptions in both of their lifecycle methods: init and service (doFilter for Filters). Developers throw exceptions in lifecycle methods to "tell" the container about problems.

  • javax.servlet.ServletException
  • javax.servlet.UnavailableException
  • java.io.IOException

Stephen is now describing the init() method and the exceptions it can throw. Yawn. I think most Java web developers use frameworks these days. Because of this, most developers probably don't use these methods because they don't write plain ol' servlets. One thing I didn't know is that UnavailableException takes a time parameter - if you throw an UnavailableException with this parameter, the container will retry after the specified amount of time.

Result of Exceptions in init(): The destroy() method is never called, since the initialization did not complete. Client calls during component unavailability render a 500 error.

I stopped taking notes at this point because my laptop battery was dying. I didn't really learn much in the rest of the presentation. While I can appreciate Stephen's enthusiasm, it was obvious that he was an instructor and not an in-the-trenches developer. He explained a lot of what and didn't have any code to show how to do stuff. There wasn't a single demo in the entire presentation.

Most of the exception handling stuff Stephen talked about for the rest of the session was common sense (IMO). It also centered around the Servlet and JSP API, which most folks probably don't mess with. The Struts and JSF coverage at the end was cool. If nothing else, it was to nice to hear a Sun employee confirm that JSF is quite deficient in its hooks to allow easy framework-configurable exception handling.

Now that I'm working at home, and working/interacting with friends all day - it seems that the DJUG meetings aren't as exciting. They used to be fun because I could get out of the house and have a few beers with friends. Maybe it was the lack of learning anything new tonight.

Posted in Java at Jan 12 2005, 11:30:50 PM MST 3 Comments
Comments:

> I thought it was exclusively used for load testing - You can do accepance tests too Trick: if you want to use assertion and verbose messages, change propertie: jmeter.save.saveservice.assertion_results=all > and I think it has an Ant task. I could be wrong. True you can find it here: http://www.programmerplanet.org/ant-jmeter (nice xml/xsl transformation output)

Posted by Benjamin Francisoud on January 13, 2005 at 02:17 AM MST #

I would be interested in hearing from you as to why you feel that unit and functional cases should be scriptable, as opposed to a compiled form?

Posted by Nick Parker on January 13, 2005 at 01:30 PM MST #

Nick - there are a few reasons I like WebTest (scriptable) over jWebUnit (compiled):

<ul class="glassList">
  • The scriptable form is much faster to change/test since no compilation is required.
  • WebTest tests can be written by QA folks - they don't have to know Java. This is very powerful if you get a QA person that's interested and willing to dig in to learn a little about WebTest and XML.
  • WebTest has *much* better JavaScript support that HttpUnit or jWebUnit. If you want to test the UIs of JSF applications, good JavaScript support is a must.
  • Posted by Matt Raible on January 14, 2005 at 10:59 AM MST #

    Post a Comment:
    • HTML Syntax: Allowed