[DJUG] JUG Central and BPEL
Last night, I attended Denver's JUG meeting. Below are my notes from the event.
I'm at DJUG listening to Christian and Kris (from Adigio)
talk about their experience with using Spring, WebWork, Hibernate, Lucene
and SiteMesh to develop JUG
Central (I wonder if they knew
this name and concept already
exists?). JSPs are for the view and MySQL powers
the data. This presentation is designed to explain a bit about each framework,
and also tips/tricks and pitfalls they experienced when developing the site.
They started working on the application in August of last year and deployed
it into production in December.
Christian said they weren't going to go into the how for each framework, but Kris has had quite a few slides on SiteMesh so far. I don't blame him - it's a great tool and only a handful of folks (of about 50-60) have heard of it.
SiteMesh Pitfalls: Poor integration with Velocity and some other frameworks. BTW, if you're using Tapestry - Erik Hatcher recently created a JIRA patch with a Tapestry Decorator.
Now Kris is talking about WebWork and since he's a framework junkie, apparently this is going to be the largest part of the presentation. I think one of the nicest parts of WebWork is its auto-type conversion. The only other frameworks I've seen that have this is are JSF and Tapestry. For those that like WebWork and don't like JSF - you might find it disturbing that the WebWork actions (and their tests) in AppFuse are very similar to the JSF managed beans. I would take it as a compliment if I were a WebWork developer.
One nice thing about XWork's action configuration is you can specify a "method"
parameter for a particular action. Struts recently added this with its MappingDispatchAction
.
I'm using this on my current project and it works quite well. Kris really
likes WebWork's front-page controller pattern - where you use the <ww:action>
tag to execute the action when the page is loaded. Personally, I don't have
a problem with going through actions to get to my view templates. Kris finished
up his WebWork piece with a plug for AppFuse (thanks!) and WebWork in Action.
Congrats to all the authors - wonder if it'll be published before WebWork
Live?
Now Christian is talking about Hibernate and its mapping files - and how you can generate your database schema from them - or generate your mapping files from a database. They used XDoclet to generate the mapping files in this particular project.
Hibernate Pitfalls: Think about lazy-loading early. Problems
arise when you try to share Hibernate-managed objects across (Hibernate)
sessions transparently. Christian mentions that Spring's OpenSessionInViewFilter
is a nice way to solve the problem.
Hibernate Tips: Spring simplifies using Hibernate and makes declarative transactions easy. Read Hibernate in Action before starting development. Plan to spend some time learning how to express your data model with Hibernate relationships (one-to-one, one-to-many, many-to-many, etc.).
Christian is now talking about Spring and how it works. After thinking and
writing about Spring so much in the last year, I'll just skip over regurgitating
this part. ;-) His main recommendation: use real injection instead of appContext.getBean("beanName")
.
Other tools used: Lucene for searching and POI for indexing Word, Excel and PowerPoint files. Velocity used for templating e-mail messages.
Service-oriented Architecture (SOA) with Business Process Execution
Language (BPEL)
Presented by Kevin Geminiuc and Owen Newnan from Policy Studies
This point of this presentation is to communicate what it's like to implement BPEL in a J2EE Container. BPEL is a layer on top of web services. BPEL is a programming language that you can use to program business processes. Allows you to divorce your business process from being human-centric to being document-centric. At Policy Studies, they're using iLog JRules rules engine and Oracle's BPEL implementation.
Benefits:
- Process Visiblity
- Process Agility
- Powerful Language
- Open
- Backed by "the Big Boys" (BEA, Microsoft, IBM)
History: Formerly knows as BPEL4WS, WSBPEL. Open standards based. Orchestrates web services with SOA.
Where we are today: Emerging technology (prepare to bang your head against the wall). .NET and Java products exist, as well as J2EE container integration.
BPEL is: | BPEL is not: |
---|---|
|
BPEL & WS Standards: BPEL, XPath, WSDL, WS-Addressing, SOAP, XML-Schema, WSIF (Axis), TBD (WS-ReliableMessaging and JSRs 207/208). Note that since BPEL depends on web services (which is not a truly reliable service). Because of this, there are some proprietary extensions available.
At this point, I became bored with the presentation and quit taking notes. While the speakers had good intentions with their knowledge sharing, their delivery needed some work. The code walkthrough and demos were presented with a monotonous and unexcited tone, and a handful of folks left during this part. In summary, BPEL looks like a good way to orchestrate your various business processes. It allows you to call web services, EJBs and whatnot simply by defining their locations and methods in XML.
In his demo, Kevin used Oracle's BPEL Designer, which is an Eclipse plugin that has a nice drag-n-drop editor for managing your BPEL XML files. He also used Oracle's BPEL Process Manager, which seemed to be a lot like Jetspeed - you just drop in the .ear and then deploy your processes to it. The only bad part about the Process Manager is it's administration/deployment interface only runs in IE.
If you're using BPEL in your projects, I'd be interested to hear the tools you're using. As far as open-source BPEL process engines, they mentioned Twister and ActiveBPEL.
Posted by Michael Koziarski on February 10, 2005 at 08:43 PM MST #
Not really. The demo was cool only because of the tools they used. There was nothing that awe-inspiring that I saw except that you could specify which objects to call from an XML file.
Posted by Matt Raible on February 11, 2005 at 05:18 AM MST #
> SiteMesh Pitfalls: Poor integration with Velocity and some other frameworks.
Personally I think Velocity is really bad code and should not be used. For example the main methods may throw null valued Exception instances without any pointer to what went wrong. And the API is unnecessarily complicated too.
Here's some more info:
Velocity versus FreeMarker
...and much much better template engine as a bonus :)
Posted by 80.186.235.171 on February 11, 2005 at 09:17 PM MST #
Posted by A Couple of Dutch Rants on February 13, 2005 at 11:45 PM MST #
Posted by Alef Arendsen on February 13, 2005 at 11:46 PM MST #