RE: Which is the Hottest Java Web Framework?
The "Break it Down" Blog has a lengthy post on Which is the Hottest Java Web Framework? Or Maybe Not Java? Comparing Java Web Frameworks is hard because so many people are passionate about the framework they know best. Add a couple more like Flex and Ruby on Rails and its downright difficult. Nevertheless, this post is good in that it contains a lot of pretty trend graphs and it looks like the author has done some good research. It's likely the folks that will scream foul are the ones that did poor in the comparison (Tapestry and Stripes, I'm talking about you).
Surprising among the top Java Web Frameworks is the rise of Struts 2:
Which is much more interesting I think is how Wicket adoption has stayed almost flat while Struts 2 adoption has spiked. Spring MVC/WebFlow seems to be going no where fast and racing JBoss Seam there.
The popularity of Struts 2 really caught me off guard with it being quite a bit different from Struts 1, I figured it got thrown into the "just another web framework" category, but I guess there is something in a name and it's doing quite well.
Regardless of what you think of the post and trends, you have to appreciate the amount of time the author put into it.
Posted by Ashish Vashisht on June 10, 2008 at 11:55 PM MDT #
Ashish, you guessed wrong. Search only for JSF:
And look at the right panel, they are all news about the Joint Strike Fighter. Struts is polluted in the same way:
These stats have some meaning, but they have big noise included.
Posted by Ignacio Coloma on June 11, 2008 at 04:10 AM MDT #
I particularly appreciate 3 points about "some good research" :
What are we measuring : buzz ? popularity ? noise ?
Why are people searching "Struts 2" or "asp.net" ? What does it mean ?
Has it historically been relevant ?
Note that I just want to add a grain of salt, not to mess up the whole meal !
Posted by Bruno Vernay on June 11, 2008 at 05:43 AM MDT #
Posted by Jesse Kuhnert on June 11, 2008 at 06:23 AM MDT #
Using google trends is fun, but trying to get decent conclusions from an analysis like that is impossible. That those trends are complete rubbish is best shown with the mailing list trends:
Posted by Davide Baroncelli on June 11, 2008 at 06:28 AM MDT #
Just as some readers mentioned, the popularity of the searched term may indicate the number of defects and issues faced by developers when using it in real development.
We are a JSF shop. When we evaluate JSF against Webwork, Spring MVC and Tapestry two years ago, we didn't do many searches. However, we have encountered numerous problems when developing with JSF and constantly have to google JSF in search of a solution...
Secondly, the terms used in the Google Trend by the "Breakt it Down" author are not ideal. Instead of using brackets, double quotes should be used to specify the order of the multiple word search terms.
Posted by Alex on June 11, 2008 at 07:13 AM MDT #
Posted by Bruno Vernay on June 11, 2008 at 07:15 AM MDT #
You have a good point about "wicket" being too common... if you remove "| wicket" from the Trend results from clicking that 2nd image, Wicket drops almost completely off the comparison chart.
It's really hard to tell if that is meaningful or not because most folks might just call it "Wicket". The reason I left "wicket" in there by itself, is because fi you Google the term, all the top results are for the Java web framework, which indicated to me that there is minor levels of confusion around that word. So I *think* the trend is mostly useful information; obviously there is some noise in all of them.
That's a good suggestion unfortunately mailing list traffic can be misleading depending on the source... check our Nabble... Wicket is one of *the* most active mailing lists they maintain for Java: http://www.nabble.com/Java-Software-f787.html
Posted by Riyad Kalla on June 11, 2008 at 09:18 AM MDT #
Actually, Google Trends shows how often something is searched for, by region. It doesn't show how many results are found, just how many times it is searched for.
If you look at the results for JSF, you will see a LOT of searches from India, and as I said, people from India are unlikely to be searching for Joint Strike Fighter in this volume... Also, did you notice the tell tale Bangalore listing? All the top cities from which people are searching seem to be outside the US.
Posted by Ashish Vashisht on June 11, 2008 at 09:49 AM MDT #
exactly, their mailing list is very active: its upwards trend is even more meaningful for this exact reason! Should that mailing list be populated by 3 poor souls, an upwards trend wouldn't tell anything, but in this case...
Anyway, I would be even more drastic, and I would use this graph:
it clearly shows that:
- JSF is declining
- Tapestry is declining (despite the fact that it's a hugely overloaded word)
- Wicket is rising (slowly)
- GWT is rising (fast)
what else does one need, if trends are that important for evaluating a web framework?
Posted by Davide Baroncelli on June 11, 2008 at 05:07 PM MDT #
BTW, I forgot, be it 1 or 2, struts is *declining* (and with good reason, I'm working a lot with webwork these days and I really don't see why anyone should prefer it to spring mvc or a component-oriented solution like wicket):
Posted by Davide Baroncelli on June 11, 2008 at 05:10 PM MDT #
I had some rather harsh responses to the original post here and here. I would suggest caution in reading too much into these, and would suggest the following job listings based trends being perhaps a little more suggestive of what you might be wanting to look at (even though I would still take it with a grain of salt - albeit lesser salt than google trends.)
Note that discerning readers are likely to better refine the queries - I simply typed them in to the best of my first pass abilities.
Absolute Job Listings
Relative Job Listings
Posted by Dhananjay Nene on June 11, 2008 at 05:30 PM MDT #
Posted by Soren on June 13, 2008 at 04:36 AM MDT #
Posted by Alex on June 13, 2008 at 08:59 AM MDT #