The T2000 Arrives
I received my T2000 server from Sun yesterday, and now it sits in its original packaging in my basement. I may not even unwrap and install it. When I originally ordered the server, I heard you could blog about it and possibly win a free one. Since then I've heard different; there's a contest with many entering, and they're only giving away a couple of them. Because of this, I've somewhat lost my motivation to install the sucker. Partly because I know I'll have to send it back, and partly because it doesn't look that fast. Regardless, it's nice to have Jeff's setup instructions if I do decide to assemble/install it.
Right now, my schedule is packed full of client work - all the way until mid-June. So if I'm going to build this bad boy, it'll have to be as part of my "late night" schedule. Right now, that's booked with Spring Live, designs for the CSS Framework and AppFuse/Equinox development.
To further justify my lack of motivation, I don't think the T2000 will solve my OOM issues with CruiseControl and Ant. I've been talking with one of the Ant developers, and it appears to be caused by the <copy> task in Ant. With any luck, I'll find some time to setup CruiseControl and do some performance testing of web frameworks before the T2000 goes back in mid-June, but it doesn't look good right now.
Posted by Benjamin on April 19, 2006 at 06:22 AM MDT #
yeah, why don't you decide if you want to keep it in 4 weeks and then return if you don't intend to use at all ?
Maybe, someone like me might want to try it out ?
Also, can't you atleast use it for your night activities -- nothing special and let us know how fast it builds on this box. Heck, you might be able to even run Linux on it and try and compare that with the Solaris ?
BR,
~A
Posted by Anjan Bacchu on April 19, 2006 at 07:08 AM MDT #
Posted by Berlin Brown on April 19, 2006 at 09:31 AM MDT #
Posted by Tim Vernum on April 19, 2006 at 11:17 AM MDT #
Posted by Scott Mark on April 19, 2006 at 01:25 PM MDT #
Tim - thanks for the clarification.
Scott - I've definitely had scalability issues with CruiseControl. Right now, it can barely test 5 different AppFuse-powered applications. I've recently learned that most of the issues are caused by Ant though - so it's likely that I'd have the same issues with any continuous integration system. Then again, we solved some OOM issues on appfuse.org last night by adding "-XX:MaxPermSize=256m" to JAVA_OPTS. So it's possible that this same setting will help CruiseControl. Regardless, I'd like to try Luntbuild in order to know another CI system.
Posted by Matt Raible on April 19, 2006 at 03:14 PM MDT #
Posted by Alonso on April 20, 2006 at 01:25 AM MDT #
Posted by Stephan Schwab on April 20, 2006 at 09:02 PM MDT #