Raible Designs

RE: Hype: Ruby on Rails

Patrick thinks that Ruby on Rails is all hype.

Now maybe I'm just a bit biased since my framework isn't getting all the slashdotters oohing and awwing over it, but I think Ruby on Rails is way over hyped. The tutorial here is great and gave me a very good overview of what it does. At the end of the day, RoR is simply a RESTful CRUD framework.

I'd like to agree with Patrick, because that is my natural tendency when I see a project that everyone praises. But I know better. I think it's better not to speculate on the productivity or usefulness of a framework until you've used it to develop an app.

That's what I did with Spring, WebWork, Tapestry and JSF last year. Now I feel like I know "the truth" and whether one framework is better than the other. The truth is they all have strengths and they all have weaknesses. While one might work well for one project, it might not for the next. I think the best thing is that you don't setup yourself for framework lock-in. If you only know one web framework for Java, you should probably pick up a book and develop an app with another framework - just to see how things are done differently. Now that I've used all of the Big 5 in Java, I don't think it would be that hard to migrate an app from one framework to next.

So what am I trying to say? Don't bash on a framework until you've tried it. And I don't mean toying around with it on a Tuesday night, I mean using it for a real-world project. I'll probably diving in and doing a little Rails development later this year. Why? So I can see if all the hype is accurate.

Maven Console and setting properties

I've been using Maven at my new gig and the Maven Console in order to avoid its painfully slow startup times. Using a slow-ass PowerBook in conjunction with Maven makes my face turn read and my ears smoke sometimes, but I'm getting used to it, much to my dismay. While the console has made things tolerable, Maven itself keeps getting in the way. I hate how it *requires* me to run my tests everytime I build or deploy. So I've turned that off by creating a build.properties file with "maven.test.skip=true". The problem with the Maven Console is it doesn't let me turn tests back on, so I'm stuck with running "maven test -Dmaven.test.skip=false" when I want to run my tests.

There's two ways I can think of to solve this problem:

• If "maven idea:multiproject" allows me to setup my project so that Tomcat/Resin/whatever can point to my source directory and I don't have to deploy. I'm a web developer, and I typically have to run "maven deploy" to test simple UI changes. That's why I turn the tests off - because I want a 1-2 second turnaround to see my changes. BTW, it's too bad there's no "eclipse:multiproject" goal.
• Enhance the console so it's possible to set properties. For example, typing "-Dmaven.test.skip=false" would set the property so the next time I run "maven war", my tests would be run. That, or allow me to run "maven war -Dmaven.test.skip=false". Allowing this would also make it possible to run a single test from the command line, instead of all (the only current option).

AppFuse distributed with Gentoo Linux?

According to the Gentoo Java Roadmap, AppFuse is on the list of apps to integrate. Nice! I'm going to rebuild my Windows 2000 Server as a Suse 9.2 box in the next couple of weeks, but I might have to reconsider and go with Gentoo. I was going to buy a gig o' RAM for the box, but it looks pretty spendy.

Today I added another item for AppFuse 1.8 in the roadmap: create an installer using MyJavaPack that can install Ant, AppFuse, MySQL and Tomcat. Basically, give developer's a way to install and start developing with AppFuse in under 5 minutes. Let me know if you're interested in helping out with this.

If you could add another framework to AppFuse, which would it be?

If you could add another web framework option to AppFuse, which one would it be and why? Please keep in mind it already includes Struts, Spring, WebWork, JSF and Tapestry.

Pick the web framework you think is cool

Ever since I started adding additional web frameworks into AppFuse, people have asked me "which framework should I use?" I've often told them "use what you know." If you have in-house knowledge of Struts, use it. I thought this was good advice because I believed that existing knowledge leads to greater productivity.

Lately, I've started to change my philosophy. I'm starting to think it's more important to use the web framework you're passionate about. The one you want to learn more about. After reading Kathy Sierra's "Does it really matter if your tool is cool?", it seems this is a good idea. She writes:

Coolness (or just perceived coolness, it really doesn't matter) is linked to passion. The cooler you perceive your tools to be, the more passionate you are about those tools. And passion, while it might lead to the "everything is a nail" syndrome, has an extraordinary amount of value!

Obviously there's quality of life... a life with passion is certainly more fun than one without. And the more passion, the greater the chances that a person has what psychologists label optimal experiences. And the more optimal experiences one has, the more likely one is to describe life as being "happy". So, passion = optimal experiences = happiness. And research says happy people are generally more productive. Certainly they're more spirited and fun to be around...

So I guess passion leads to greater productivity, not existing knowledge. So which web framework do you think is cool? Which one are you passionate about?

If I had to choose based on my passionate choice, and the one that I think is the coolest, I'd have to go with Tapestry or possibly JSF (JSF would be a lot cooler if it let me put my JSPs in the WEB-INF directory instead of in the root). These are the frameworks I want to learn more about. 6 months from now? Maybe Laszlo or JDNC.

[ANN] AppFuse 1.7 Released

This release adds support for JSF/MyFaces and Tapestry as web framework options. AppGen has been updated to work with both of these frameworks and I added new tutorials as well. You can read about my integration experience in a previous post.

After I released AppFuse 1.6.1, I knew the only way I was going to get Tapestry and JSF support done was if I stayed close to the code and started the next release. I never envisioned developing the Tapestry and JSF versions of AppFuse at the same time, but it turned out to be very efficient. If you want a comparison of all the different web frameworks in AppFuse (and AppFuse Light) - you can checkout my Comparing Web Frameworks presentation. If you want more in-depth coverage - it'll be in the next Chapter of Spring Live.

• Download
• Release Notes
• Learn more about AppFuse
• Live Demos:
  • Struts + Spring + Hibernate
  • Spring + iBATIS
  • WebWork + Spring + Hibernate
  • JSF + Spring + Hibernate
  • Tapestry + Spring + Hibernate

If you find any issues, let us know.

The AppFuse Generator

I found the AppFuse Generator project in my comments last night. Richard So seems to have created a nice code-generation tool for AppFuse. It looks like it can create/modify all the files you need to CRUD a database table. I took a brief look at the code and it's all based on Velocity templates, so you should be able to easily tweak things.

This tool does seem to generate the DAOs/Managers - which can lead to more code to maintain. It would be nice if it could be modified to be similar to AppGen where there's a "detailed" version (that generates everything) and a "default" version (which only generates the web tier classes). The default version could use the generic "dao" and "manager" beans. I wonder if this tool supports running/installing the same table more than once? This currently doesn't work too well with AppGen, but shouldn't be too hard to fix.

In reality, I'm pumped that Richard has created this, as well as a project to back it up. I especially like that he's going to try and create an Eclipse Plug-in as part of this project. Nice work Richard!

[ANN] AppFuse 1.6.1 Released

This release is primarily a bug fix release, but it also contains a slick "AppGen" tool for generating full CRUD (with sample data and tests) from a POJO. AppGen essentially automates everything you do in the tutorials. I still encourage users to read through and do the tutorials in order to learn the code that is being generated. This feature basically reduces the amount of files you need to create/alter for CRUD from 16 to 2. Better yet, rather than generating the DAO and Manager (as well as the tests), it just uses generic methods in the base implementations. This eliminates the need (and hopefully desire) to create so many DAOs and Managers. In most cases, you can simply use the "manager" bean in your Actions/Controllers and call its respective methods. Thanks to Hibernate for making generic CRUD possible with only a handful of methods. Now you should be able to simply concentrate on the web-tier and only modify/create backend classes when you need special behavior.

• Download
• Release Notes
• Learn more about AppFuse
• Live Demos:
  • Struts + Spring + Hibernate
  • Spring + iBATIS
  • WebWork + Spring + Hibernate

To upgrade your 1.6 based application, I recommend performing the following steps:

• Download 1.6.1 and extract it to your hard drive.
• If you've renamed your packages, use the Rename Packages Tool to rename packages in 1.6.1.
• Use Beyond Compare (Windows only) to diff the your project against 1.6.1.

This is how I've always done my AppFuse upgrades for Struts-Resume. It takes a couple of hours, but it's a lot easier than me trying to create an upgrade package.

I'll be talking about AppFuse this weekend at Denver's NFJS Conference. Next Monday I'll be in Vegas at ApacheCon. I've never done two different talks back-to-back before, let alone at two different conferences. Should be fun.

Rails - the MVC Framework for Ruby

When I first saw the quick setup for Rails video, I dismissed it as a something simple that wasn't that cool. Thanks to Dion's post, I decided to watch it again. Then I realized why it looked so simple the first time - the video kept looping and all I saw was the Apache setup part - I didn't see the whole video. After watching the video this morning, it's enough to make me want to become a Ruby developer and use Rails to develop my next webapp. Then again, Ruby probably doesn't pay the bills nearly as well. The upside is it looks like it would actually run fast on OS X instead of the dog-slow Ant/Tomcat/Eclipse/IDEA combination.

Hopefully I'll get to learn more about Rails at Denver's upcoming No Fluff Just Stuff. It looks like Dave has added it to his repertoire. I wonder if Rails has support for using the Copeland IoC container?

AppFuse's License

Someone sent me an e-mail today and made me aware that the Commons Attribute License that AppFuse uses only applies to documents and such:

"Collective Work" means a work, such as a periodical issue, anthology or encyclopedia, in which the Work in its entirety in unmodified form, along with a number of other contributions, constituting separate and independent works in themselves, are assembled into a collective whole.

Because of this, I'm thinking of switching to use an Apache 2 License. This seems to be the friendliest license for open source. Basically, all I want to do is try to get folks that use AppFuse to give it some credit. Which really means they're marketing it in a sense. More marketing -> more users -> (hopefully) I'll stay employed and the product will get better.

The only pain I can see about licensing with an Apache License is they want you to add a short copyright notice at the top. But I'm not really handing the copyright of AppFuse over to ASF, am I? Do I have to add this copyright to all my .java files? I know that Spring does this, but... ugh ... seems rather unnecessary.