Matt RaibleMatt Raible is a writer with a passion for software. Connect with him on LinkedIn.

The Angular Mini-Book The Angular Mini-Book is a guide to getting started with Angular. You'll learn how to develop a bare-bones application, test it, and deploy it. Then you'll move on to adding Bootstrap, Angular Material, continuous integration, and authentication.

Spring Boot is a popular framework for building REST APIs. You'll learn how to integrate Angular with Spring Boot and use security best practices like HTTPS and a content security policy.

For book updates, follow @angular_book on Twitter.

The JHipster Mini-Book The JHipster Mini-Book is a guide to getting started with hip technologies today: Angular, Bootstrap, and Spring Boot. All of these frameworks are wrapped up in an easy-to-use project called JHipster.

This book shows you how to build an app with JHipster, and guides you through the plethora of tools, techniques and options you can use. Furthermore, it explains the UI and API building blocks so you understand the underpinnings of your great application.

For book updates, follow @jhipster-book on Twitter.

10+ YEARS


Over 10 years ago, I wrote my first blog post. Since then, I've authored books, had kids, traveled the world, found Trish and blogged about it all.
You searched this site for "la blue girl episodesorgasm denial web tease". 1,368 entries found.

You can also try this same search on Google.

[OSCON] Monday Morning

Facets of Ruby
Presented by Dave Thomas, OSCON 2005

I'm sitting in Dave Thomas's session on Intro to Ruby at the Oregon Convention Center. It looks like someone finally figured out the main problem with conferences - lack of power outlets. Kudos to O'Reilly - they've put power strips at the base of every table in this room. With the high-speed wireless and unlimited power, this conference is getting off to a great start.

Is programming still fun?

Round about 2000, programming started getting tedious for Dave - after having fun for the past 25 years. When we program, we combine all the problems of the artistic side of the race with all of the problems of the scientific side of the race. The only way to be successful at it is to enjoy doing it.

Is programming productive?

It has to be to enjoy it. The most satisfying thing about programming is watching it run. That's why scripting languages are so great - because you can see it run now. Myth: a good programmer can be a good programmer in any language. Language and tools make a difference - a good programmer knows which language to choose for a particular problem.

This session is not going to be a syntax session. Damn, sounds like I won't really learn how to program Ruby in this session.

Ruby, the Language

Born in Japan in 1994. Father: Invented by Yukihiro Matsumoto (Matz). Mother: Ada, Smalltalk, CLU, Perl, Lisp. Grew very rapidly in 2000, outpaced Python in 2000. Became international star in 2004.

Dave and Andy are language freaks and downloaded Ruby 1.4 shortly after finishing The Pragmatic Programmer. It passed the 5-minute test, the 1/2-hour test and Dave ended up playing with it all morning. The first Pickax book was 500+ pages long, and they wrote it because there wasn't much English-language documentation on Ruby. Ever since Rails, Ruby's adoption has grown exponentially.

Ruby is a multi-paradigm language: procedural, object-oriented, functional, meta-programming. You can write procedural code, but you'll be using OO concepts at the same time. You can do all of these at the same time.

Ruby code example:

# Generate Fibonacci numbers up to a given limit

def fib_up_to(max)
  f1, f2 = 1, 1
  while f1 <= max
    puts f1
    f1, f2 = f2, f1+f2
  end
end

fib_up_to(1000)

Methods start with def and end with end. The parenthesis around the method arguments are optional.

Now Dave is ragging on Java Programmers and how they discount Ruby because of its duck typing. In a Java program, most things are dynamically typed too. This is because most objects are stored in collections and whenever you pull things out of a collection - you have to cast from Object to the real type. The argument is that you don't have to have static typing. Dave hates Generics because he thinks they should've just done automatic casting.

The basic gist of Dave's argument is that we use dynamic typing (using casting) in Java all the time and you don't see Runtime exceptions all of the place. So the biggest proponents of static typing are actually using dynamic typing all of the place.

Back to the code: in Ruby, you don't need parenthesis around conditionals (for instance in the while statement above). The main reason we have parenthesis is because of Fortran. There's no reason for them. You can put parenthesis and semi-colons in your code, but you don't need to. In this code example, the variables are scoped for the duration of the method. puts (pronounced "put s") just prints the value of a variable to the console.

class Song
  def initialize(a_title)
    @title = a_title
  end
  def title
    @title
  end
end

Instance variables in Ruby start with an @ sign. The first time you use them, they spring into existence. If you access an instance variable and it's value hasn't been set - it's value is nil. Using the return keyword at the end of a method is optional - the default is to return the last line of a method. You can change the "title" method to use

attr_reader :title 

The attr_reader call is actually a method of Class:class. The attr_reader will dynamically add an accessor (that looks like the title method above). To create a setter, you can use attr_accessor and it'll create both a getter and setter.

Ruby is a single Inheritance language.

class KaraokeSong < Song

  attr_reader :lyric

  def initialize(a_title, a_lyric)
    super(a_title)
    @lyric = a_lyric
  end
end

Unlike Java, the super call can happen in any line, or not at all. To solve the single-inheritance problem, you can use mixins and apply them to any class.

Blocks and iterators are pervasive in Ruby, and look to be very easy to use.

3.times { puts "Ho!" }

hash.each { |key, value|
  puts "#{key} -> #{value}"
end

To do method calls with blocks, you use the yield keyword.

You can use blocks to simplify Resource Management and automatically close resources.

File.open("myfile.dat") do |f|
  name = f.gets
  # whatever
end

When the above code hits end, the file is automatically closed.

Duck Typing

Strongly-typed objects, untyped variables and methods. Types are implicitly determined by the things that an object can do. Duck typing is great for testing, refactoring and maintenance. This is very similar to concepts in Smalltalk. There is a strong commitment to unit testing in Ruby - which makes duck typing even easier to use. Duck typing makes things very easy. For example, you can have a method that takes a file as a parameter - and writes data to it. You can test this method by passing in a String (which also supports << for appending) and verify that your method's logic works.

Duck typing is useful in regular code for reducing coupling and increasing flexibility. Ruby community now differentiates the type (what it can do) of an object and the class (what generated it) of an object.

The Road to Metaprogramming

Metaprogramming is really, really powerful in Ruby. Library writers use it, but most developers don't use it. The ActiveRecord framework is an example of metaprogramming. Rather than being an O/R Mapping tool, it's more of a database table wrapper. The belongs_to, has_one, has_many and other validation_presence_of method calls can be written by you. Allowing you to write DSL (domain-specific languages) that appear to be a part of the Ruby language.

4 steps to metaprogramming:

  1. Classes are open: in Ruby, you can always add methods, attributes, etc. to existing classes. For example, you can add an encrypt() method to the String class. Isn't this dangerous? What if someone changes the logic of + for math expressions. No, because if one of your programmers overrides methods that breaks things - you take them out in the parking lot and beat them with a rubber hose! The language shouldn't prohibit us from doing powerful things.
  2. Definitions are active: code executes during what would normally be compilation. As the class if being defined, the code is being executed. For example, you can check if an environment variable is set - and create methods (i.e. log.debug()) accordingly. This can be great for caching.
  3. All method calls have a receiver: Methods are executed on objects. There's always a current object: self. Methods with no explicit receiver are executed on current object.
  4. Classes are objects too: You can easily add methods to classes.

Many more Ruby features: Reflection and ObjectSpace, Marshalling and Distributed Ruby, Tk, Gtk, Fox, networking, databases, etc. Garbage collection, Threads (like Java green threads), Modules and mixins. ObjectSpace - allows you to reflect on all of the objects that exist at runtime. Marshalling allows you to serialize into binary or text formats. No XML - uses YAML instead. Unlike XML, it's readable and looks more like a properties file. Modules (and their methods) can be easily included into a class simply by using "include ModuleName".

Now Dave is going to write a program to extract book sales ranks from Amazon pages, publish them as an RSS Feed, store them in a database, and access via a web application (using Rails). Since this is likely to involve a lot of live coding, I probably won't blog the code Dave writes.

Web Applications in Ruby can be done with Simple CGI, FastCGI, mod_ruby and frameworks (like Rails). Iowa, CGIKit, Nitro and Ruby on Rails are all web frameworks in Ruby. Iowa is a Ruby implementation of Apple's WebObjects. Dave's quote: "Apple really screwed up with WebObjects, they could've owned the market on web frameworks."

Summary

  • Use Ruby because it is Lightweight. A Ruby download is under 10 MB. Ruby Gems allows easy package management for downloading libraries and documentation.
  • Use Ruby is Transparent. It's nice and easy to read - and it only takes a couple of hours to learn its syntax.
  • Portable - runs on PDAs and Mainframes.
  • Open Source - MIT/Artistic style license. 1.8.3's regular expression engine is LGPL, 1.9's engine will be BSD-style license.
  • Easy to Learn - uses the Principle of Least Surprise. Things seem to work as you'd expect. Dave knows people that've downloaded Ruby and put web applications on line in the same morning - w/o any prior knowledge of Ruby.
  • Fun! It's enjoyable to program in.

Ruby Resources

Posted in Open Source at Aug 01 2005, 11:20:05 AM MDT 9 Comments

OSCON: Next week in Portland

I'm starting to get pretty pumped about OSCON next week in Portland. Unlike the rest of the conferences I attend, this one is close to home. My parents live in Salem, Oregon - which is a mere 40 miles south of Portland. I spent my last two years of high school in Salem, so I still have a few friends in the area too. To get the most out of the trip, I'm flying into Portland on Sunday and commuting from Salem to Portland for the first couple days.

On Monday, I'm going to do a Ruby-immersion day and spend it listening to Dave Thomas and David Heinemeier Hansson. I hope to come out of these sessions with enough knowledge to write a webapp in Rails. Since I'm aspiring to be an open source web frameworks expert, instead of Just Java - this seems like a good fit. In the next few months, I plan on learning more about Rails, as well as other open source web frameworks in general (any and all suggestions welcome).

Tuesday, I'm giving an AppFuse Tutorial and Wednesday I'll be duking it out with Matthew Porter. Other tutorials and sessions I hope to attend are Kathy Sierra's Creating Passionate Users, Joe Walnes' SiteMesh talk and I could probably stand to learn a bit more about Beehive.

Another reason this conference will be a lot of fun is because many of the SourceBeat Authors are attending. It's always a good time when you rendezvous with a bunch of smart developers. Last, but not least, if you're attending OSCON, you might want to check the New Sessions entry on O'Reilly's blog.

Posted in Java at Jul 28 2005, 11:53:56 AM MDT 12 Comments

Taming JSF 1.1

A couple weeks ago, I received an e-mail from Ray Davis of University of California, Berkeley. In the e-mail, he provided me a link to his team's Confluence Wiki - where he describes their experience and frustrations with JSF 1.1. I really like how Ray explains the problems they experienced, as well as how they fixed them. The "request thread" scope they created sounds similar to what Spring Web Flow does.

Our experience left us very happy with Spring, moderately happy with Hibernate, and not at all happy with JSF. We did manage to deliver a Pilot Gradebook that told us what we needed to know, but sacrificed reliability, consistency, and scalability to do so.

In January 2005, when we moved to full-time work on the official Sakai 2.0 Gradebook, JSF was our biggest concern.

It's a good read for those looking to jump into JSF. I think JSF 1.2 will solve a lot of problems, but who knows how long it will take to get a RI and MyFaces version of that.

Posted in Java at Jul 27 2005, 02:51:40 PM MDT 9 Comments

The DOM Scripting Task Force

It's nice to see that someone is going to help make JavaScript code more standardized.

"The skillset of a front end programmer is a three-legged stool: structure (XHTML) is the first leg, presentation (CSS) the second, and behavior (DOM Scripting) the third," said Peter-Paul Koch, a prominent scripting expert and one of the founders of the task force. "These three legs should be equal, but at the moment the behavior leg is the shortest, least-valued and least-understood of the three, even though the DOM has been a W3C specification for seven years and enjoys relatively solid browser support."

The Web Standards Project did a good job of helping evangelize and promote standards in HTML and CSS - let's hope they can do the same for scripting the DOM.

Posted in The Web at Jul 18 2005, 06:47:28 PM MDT Add a Comment

Pretty radio buttons and checkboxes

Philip Howard has a nice tutorial on creating pretty radio buttons and checkboxes using CSS and Javascript. Nice work Philip. Hat tip to CSS Beauty.

Posted in The Web at Jul 17 2005, 05:04:01 PM MDT 1 Comment

[DJUG] Building an Open Source ESB and Ruby on Rails

Managing Chaos
Building an Open Source Enterprise Service Bus from Scratch

Bruce Tate got rained out in Texas, so Bruce Snyder and Jeff Genender are talking about building an ESB with open source software. Bruce and Jeff created this product in the last project they were on. I was lucky enough to work with them on it the first half of this year - but only after the ESB was created. The final product was very stable and the client loved it.

Bruce is a Geronimo committer and one of the founders of the Castor project. Jeff is also a Geronimo guy and is currently working on a JBoss Live book for SourceBeat. The problem that the ESB was trying to solve was fixing a horrendous data flow. A lot of the data flow was occurring between people's PCs, shared drives, FTP servers, HTTP Servers, web servers - and rarely were things automated. Bruce recalls one of his first days when he heard the trading guys yelling at each other to "close the spreadsheet".

The solution to the problem was building an Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) that performed the following:

  • Centralized Management of Activities
  • Powerful Scheduler
  • Guaranteed Event and Activity Execution
  • Durable Transactions
  • Pluggable ESB Components for Activities
  • Staging Database for Single Common Data Location
  • Logging and Notification of Activities
  • Proactive Response to Failed Activities
  • J2EE Architecture - Provides for True 24/7 Uptime

The pluggable components were called transformers and were standalone JARs that lived on their own, but could be managed by the ESB. Notifications were key so the traders would be notified when something went wrong.

Architecture

Scheduler (Quartz) » Workflow (jBPM) » Persisted Guaranteed Messaging (JMS). JMS talked to Activities (a.k.a. transformers).

The Quartz Java Scheduler is an open source project from OpenSymphony. It's a persisted scheduling engine, so it'll live through app server restarts. It also has millisecond granularity.

For workflow, the Java Business Process Manager (jBPM) was used. It doesn't use BPEL, and was used to track multiple activities and make decisions based on an activity's completion or failure status. Other functionality included tracking the activity state (running, cancelled, completed) and sending/managing notifications. Workflow was very important because the previous system had no way of detecting where things failed in a process. With the new system, downstream dependencies were handled, the escalation path was based on success or failure - and automatic retry occurred on failures if the failure reason was a known and configured expectation.

For messaging, JMS was used - implemented with EJB and MDB. This provided guaranteed and persisted messages. Events were automatically recovered if the server failed.

Activities/Transformers were pluggable components (wrapped with EJBs for transactionality). The nice thing about using EJBs was it was easy to create JARs for each transformer, drop them into JBoss and they'd immediately become available.

The system was all managed with a management console, that was a webapp implemented in Struts, Spring and Hibernate. Most of the Spring and Hibernate classes and configuration was generated with Middlegen and XDoclet. The management console allowed you to kick off activities, monitor their progress, as well as manage users with Active Directory and single sign-on with NTLM and jCIFS.

Solution Facts

Since December 2004, over 200,000 jobs have been run through this system. Of those, 500K activities have been run, with < 10,000 failed activities (2% failure rate). Nearly all failures were due to external issues, such as unavailability of remote systems and databases, or source files not available.

Tools and APIs Used

When Jeff showed up, it was a Microsoft shop using ASP, Visual Studio and some PowerBuilder. They brought Jeff in to help them use and adopt open source. The first thing they did was install and begin to use CVS (previously source control was done on shared drives). They also used Maven to build everything and produce a project site - which the managers and C-types loved. One thing they mentioned is they often got questions from higher-ups like "How much does it cost?" They did have problems with Maven, but it was mainly due to the poor documentation. They found a lot of Maven solutions by cracking open plugins and looking at their Jelly files.

Development Lessons Learned

Configuring EJBs and MDBs as singletons helped solve some problems (a JBoss setting allows you to configure this). As for running Spring in a heavily-managed environment, they found that setting singleton="false" solved a lot of problems. The next problem they had was mixing Hibernate and JTA Transactions. No details, just that they had an interesting time and it took them a few days to get it working. The last problem they encountered was using Hibernate and/or Spring JDBC to manage hundreds of thousands of records. Since these O/R tools create objects for each record, OOM errors occurred with large resultsets.

Business Lessons Learned

All notification messages came from the ESB, leading many to believe the problem was the ESB - rather than the data sources it was talking to. By using open source, they saved the company $500K in licenses fees. The interesting part was the company had a 3rd-generation agreement with IBM, and owned $12 million worth of licenses for WebSphere and WSAD. The reason this group used open source was because there weren't enough licenses.

Bruce and Jeff's presentation was good, but they looked like a couple of goofballs standing up there in their t-shirts and shorts (standard Virtuas gear). I guess that's what happens when you get a 2-hour notice. The worst part about the presentation was the fact that the A/C doesn't work and it's about 85° in here. I told Geary he'd better keep in short or I'm outta here. ;-)

Ruby on Rails
David Geary

David got into Rails by reading an article called "Rolling with Rails". In the article, the author claimed that you can develop webapps in Rails at least 10 times faster than in Java. David responded to the article on his blog with an entry called the Ruby on Rails Koolaid. He experienced quite a butt-whooping from various folks, including Rails' founder - and realized afterwards that the claims might be valid. After working with Rails, David believes that Rails is probably 5-10 times faster.

Ruby

Potent mix of SmallTalk, Perl and Python. Everything is an object. No static type checking. Duck Typing (talks like a duck, walks like a duck, it probably is a duck). Testing usually solves the lack of static types. Blocks - like anonymous inner classes, but retain state. Mixins - a cheap way of doing multiple inheritance. Dynamic classes - can modify at runtime (add methods, renaming methods, etc.). Rails takes great advantage of the dynamic attributes as part of its framework.

David is now showing a ContactsController that has 5 methods for CRUDing a Contact object. 4 of the 5 methods are one-liners. It kinda reminds me of my Hibernate DAOs after integrating Spring. ;-)

Rails

Ruby-based MVC framework. Convention over configuration. Scaffolding - builds pieces of your application for you. ActiveRecord does O/R Mapping. Has a built-in testing framework. Near-zero configuration (no XML). Zero-second deploy time (development environment).

David's first demo is being done by audience member Kirk. David asked for a volunteer from the audience with MySQL experience, and the ability to type in a few commands. David said his 6-year old daughter was able to do this demo last night successfully - so Kirk's gonna look pretty bad if he can't pull it off. ;-)

Using scaffolding, Rails generates 1 controller, a test for it, a helper class, a css file and 5 rhtml templates. Kirk pulled off the demo, even though he had a bit of trouble with the Mac environment. This is a lot like AppFuse's AppGen in a sense - except AppGen has to parse a bunch of XML files and reconfigure them.

David keeps hammering that the most productive feature of Rails is that there is zero deploy time. Save. Refresh. It looks very similar to developing a static HTML site.

Rails has ActiveRecord, ActionPack (MVC), ActionMailer, ActionWebService, Ajax Support, Transactions and Security. Currently at version 0.13.1 - the last version before 1.0.

David is delivering an excellent presentation, but it's too damn hot without A/C - I'm outta here.

Posted in Java at Jul 13 2005, 11:03:46 PM MDT 6 Comments

Scaling with Rails

Whenever I talk to developers in the Java community about Rails, the first question out of their mouth is usually "But can it scale?" Today, David has written a nice post titled It's boring to scale with Ruby on Rails.

The one thing that I see time and time again is that Java developers don't seem to realize that some of the highest traffic sites on the net are using LAMP stacks similar to what Rails advocates. IMHO, I don't think "Rails can't scale" is a valid argument. In fact, I don't know if there's any argument or way to put down Rails anymore.

As a developer, my guess is the rates for programming in Ruby developer are less than for programming in Java (unless you're a Ruby Superstar of course), so that's one reason not to program in it. However, since Rails is one of those new bright and shiny things, chances are you might be able to get high rates for it. As far as Enterprise Adoption of Rails, unfortunately I think that's still pretty far on the horizon. I think the hardest part is convincing management that they'll be able to find developers to support it. Mind you, I didn't say good developers, just developers. Period. This is information I've gathered from talking to my Java developer friends.

Try convincing a Fortune 500 company to program in Rails vs. Struts and they'll probably choose Struts because there are thousands of Struts Developers. Is this a good decision on their part? I don't think so. I think it's more important to hire smart people that can learn a technology, rather than hiring those that know a technology. Of course, if someone knows a technology really well, there's probably no harm in hiring them.

I think Rails can become a real contender in the Enterprise if managers can be convinced that it'll be easy to maintain Rails application. Remember that most of software cost is maintenance. Because of this, the whole "it's super productive to develop with" doesn't matter so much - does it? Are Rails applications easy to maintain? My guess is yes, but how do you convince CTOs and CIOs? Another thing I think Rails needs for Enterprise Adoption is good tool support. Drag and Drop type of stuff. Why? Because management loves that stuff (because then they can develop apps) and it's a great sales tool. ASP.NET has been successful because of Visual Studio, not because of its ease-of-use and simple syntax.

Will I learn Rails and use it to develop applications? I certainly hope to, but it's hard enough convincing companies to use something other than Struts - so I don't know if I'll have much luck in selling Rails. The one cool thing about my new job at Virtuas is its an open source company, not just a Java open source company. This opens the doors for me to learn about Rails (and others) and compare them to Java Web Frameworks.

Update: Aaron Rustad has written an interesting article for DeveloperWorks that compares Rails to Struts+Hibernate: Ruby on Rails and J2EE: Is there room for both?

Posted in Java at Jul 12 2005, 08:45:26 AM MDT 28 Comments

eXtremeTable - another table tag for sorting and paging

From the AppFuse mailing list and the Spring Forums, I learned about eXtremeTable. This JSP Tag looks similar to the Display Tag, except that it includes support for checkboxes and filtering columns out-of-the-box. If you've used this tag, please let me know how it's working for you.

eXtremeTable Demo

Posted in Java at Jul 11 2005, 07:33:47 AM MDT 26 Comments

Off to Big Sky Country

Holland Lake In only a few more hours, we're heading on Raible Family Roadtrip #9. Number 7 was when Julie, Abbie and I traveled up the California coast, and number 8 was when my Dad and I drove my '66 Bus to Denver from San Diego. This time it's going to be much more special. The end destination is my favorite place on earth. We're heading for the cabin, which is a log cabin my grandpa built in 1918. I was born in one corner, my sister in the other, and I spent the first 16 years of my life there.

Spending the 4th of July at the cabin has been a long standing family tradition. It's always fun to watch the parade and the O-Mok-See in the small town I grew up in. The Swan Valley is a very special place and my friends that visit often return. It really is one of those uniquely special places on Earth.

I love road trips. Julie hates them, but tolerates the fact that I love them. The main reason we're not flying to Montana is because the flights are very expensive. It's a 1 and 1/2 hour plane ride and a 15-hour drive in the car. It's a good thing we have a DVD system in our Odyssey for the kids - 15 hours is a heckuva long trip.

While I was at JavaOne last week, Julie did some research and discovered that Yellowstone isn't too far out of our way, so we're staying there tomorrow night. I've been to Yellowstone a few times, and every time it takes my breath away. I can't wait to see the look on Abbie's face when she sees an Elk right outside her window.

The best part about the whole trip? It's sure to be the family, laughing and creating memories. But I'm also going unplugged - which I haven't done in a while. For the next week, I'll be without a laptop and refusing to check voicemail or e-mail. E-mail is going to suck when I get back, but the peace of mind while I'm gone is sure to be priceless.

Posted in General at Jul 01 2005, 11:25:40 PM MDT 6 Comments

Web Framework Comparison Whitepaper

Working at Virtuas in June was really a lot of fun. We worked a fair amount preparing for JavaOne, and also found time to work on a number of whitepapers. These whitepapers are part of an Open Source Landscape Series that has been posted to Virtuas's site. For your convenience, here's a current list:

In addition to the whitepaper, I also wrote an article for JDJ that'll be showing up in the July issue.

Posted in Java at Jun 30 2005, 07:54:10 PM MDT 8 Comments