Does Microsoft own the internet?
There's an interesting conspiracy theory
over at Zeldman's joint.
Dave Winer puts the death of IE5/Mac into context,
concluding "It took (Bill Gates) ten years to erase the web as a
threat. It's done now. He owns it, it's in the trunk (I know you don't
like to hear this), it's locked, and they're driving it off a cliff
into the ocean."
The timing of recent events bears out Dave's thesis, at least as far as Microsoft's intentions
are concerned. The U.S. government found Microsoft guilty of having
criminally abused its monopoly power to crush competing Internet-based
businesses. Yet the government did nothing about it. The AOL lawsuit
posed a problem for Microsoft; so Microsoft bought off AOL. Only after AOL took the money
did Microsoft quietly let slip the news that it intends to kill its Mac
and Windows browsers. (And in fact, we now learn, some eighteen months
ago a few Microsoft marketers told a designer friend that the company
intended to kill its own browsers once all the legal hubbub died down.)
By its recent actions, Microsoft seems to believe that if consumers
want the Internet, they will use the next version of Windows to access
Microsoft-based web services and MSN content, and to download XBox
patches. And some consumers will do just that. But consumers have a
choice.
So what does all this mean? Nothing to web developers IMO - just that IE will be around for a long time and (hopefully) will continue to support web standards. I think it will - Microsoft never seems to get rid of its codebases.
Posted by Paul Rivers on June 17, 2003 at 05:15 AM MDT #
Posted by James Chochlinski on June 17, 2003 at 08:13 PM MDT #
The use of backgroun-position:fixed is killing the image in decent browsers. ;)
More explicity, this works fine:
.smokey { padding-right: 200px; background-image: url('http://www.zeldman.com/i/2003/parts/olghost.gif'); background-color: rgb(224, 134, 30); background-position: bottom right; background-repeat: no-repeat; color: inherit; }The fact that this means nothing to web developers is a _bad_ thing. It means we're going to be stuck with IE6 and its very very buggy rendering engine for roughly the next decade, which is roughly how long it takes for a majority of users to have upgraded their OS.
Posted by Phil Wilson on June 18, 2003 at 12:08 PM MDT #
Posted by Matt Raible on June 18, 2003 at 12:19 PM MDT #