Matt RaibleMatt Raible is a Java Champion and Developer Advocate at Okta. developer.okta.com

The JHipster Mini-Book The JHipster Mini-Book is a guide to getting started with hip technologies today: Angular, Bootstrap, and Spring Boot. All of these frameworks are wrapped up in an easy-to-use project called JHipster.

This book shows you how to build an app with JHipster, and guides you through the plethora of tools, techniques and options you can use. Furthermore, it explains the UI and API building blocks so you understand the underpinnings of your great application.

For book updates, follow @jhipster-book on Twitter.

10+ YEARS


Over 10 years ago, I wrote my first blog post. Since then, I've authored books, had kids, traveled the world, found Trish and blogged about it all.

Does Microsoft own the internet?

There's an interesting conspiracy theory over at Zeldman's joint.

Dave Winer puts the death of IE5/Mac into context, concluding "It took (Bill Gates) ten years to erase the web as a threat. It's done now. He owns it, it's in the trunk (I know you don't like to hear this), it's locked, and they're driving it off a cliff into the ocean."

The timing of recent events bears out Dave's thesis, at least as far as Microsoft's intentions are concerned. The U.S. government found Microsoft guilty of having criminally abused its monopoly power to crush competing Internet-based businesses. Yet the government did nothing about it. The AOL lawsuit posed a problem for Microsoft; so Microsoft bought off AOL. Only after AOL took the money did Microsoft quietly let slip the news that it intends to kill its Mac and Windows browsers. (And in fact, we now learn, some eighteen months ago a few Microsoft marketers told a designer friend that the company intended to kill its own browsers once all the legal hubbub died down.)

By its recent actions, Microsoft seems to believe that if consumers want the Internet, they will use the next version of Windows to access Microsoft-based web services and MSN content, and to download XBox patches. And some consumers will do just that. But consumers have a choice.

So what does all this mean? Nothing to web developers IMO - just that IE will be around for a long time and (hopefully) will continue to support web standards. I think it will - Microsoft never seems to get rid of its codebases.

Posted in The Web at Jun 16 2003, 06:37:49 PM MDT 4 Comments
Comments:

Whoa! Nice background picture!

Posted by Paul Rivers on June 16, 2003 at 11:15 PM MDT #

What background picture? Oh, it doesn't show up in Mozilla Firebird, just IE. Was that done on purpose to prove a point?

Posted by James Chochlinski on June 17, 2003 at 02:13 PM MDT #

The use of backgroun-position:fixed is killing the image in decent browsers. ;)

More explicity, this works fine:

.smokey {
  padding-right: 200px;
  background-image: url('http://www.zeldman.com/i/2003/parts/olghost.gif');
  background-color: rgb(224, 134, 30);
  background-position: bottom right;
  background-repeat: no-repeat;
  color: inherit;
}

The fact that this means nothing to web developers is a _bad_ thing. It means we're going to be stuck with IE6 and its very very buggy rendering engine for roughly the next decade, which is roughly how long it takes for a majority of users to have upgraded their OS.

Posted by Phil Wilson on June 18, 2003 at 06:08 AM MDT #

Thanks for the tip Phil! This has been fixed for the particular <p> in question. ;-)

Posted by Matt Raible on June 18, 2003 at 06:19 AM MDT #

Post a Comment:
Comments are closed for this entry.