This
site is 29.18% text context. Apparently, the rest is markup. Found via web-graphics.com.
The tool (wittingly called getContentSize) apparently does
not include images or attached CSS, or javascript in it's analysis. I believe
that considering it measures my total page size as 51131 bytes, where Phoenix
tells me it's 55270 bytes. What it doesn't tell you is that I have around 250
(yes 250!) links on this site, and since it doesn't count those as text (<a
href> is markup), I think I've done pretty well. Here are some interesting
statistics for other sites (and lots of markup with little text):
| URL |
total page size (bytes) |
text content (bytes) |
% text |
| russellbeattie.com/notebook |
87074 |
46296 |
53.17 |
| zeldman.com |
22734 |
10408 |
45.78 |
| webstandards.org |
10021 |
4541 |
45.31 |
| raibledesigns.com |
51131 |
14918 |
29.18 |
| theserverside.com |
54030 |
14056 |
26.02 |
| scripting.com |
79463 |
18869 |
23.75 |
| google.com |
2532 |
362 |
14.30 |
| cnn.com |
50755 |
4502 |
8.87 |
| microsoft.com |
31180 |
2603 |
8.35 |
| sun.com |
13443 |
1087 |
8.09 |
| apple.com |
17512 |
840 |
4.8 |
Remember this post? I wrote about how much I liked Michael's photo album software. Well, lo and behold, he heard me and sent this e-mail:
Matt,
Hi, and thanks for the mention on your site. =)
My photo album stuff was a reworking in PHP of some other photo album/gallery things I'd seen. Of course everyone is looking for something specific, and I was no different, so I decided I needed to make one with what I wanted. That meant it also had to be XHTML and CSS compliant, and I decided on an all CSS layout for ease of updating (that, and I love CSS, heh).
It's basically a three-tiered approach, with thumbnails, medium-sized images and hi-res versions. It's just one main file in a root directory, and a CSS file, title file, and optional pic info/annotation file in each photo directory. Since the program uses the CSS file in each directory, I can create a different layout for each album. I did a couple of minor changes in some of them just to show that they don't all have to look the same.
What it doesn't do:
Currently it does not do any real image handling such as creating thumbnails. I do all the image editing manually and compile a directory of photos (with their respective subdirectories) and just upload it. The program sees the directory automatically.
Also currently, you have to have all 3 versions of photos. I haven't incorporated an option to replace thumnails with text links, or to use/not use hi-res images.
I plan on putting some of these things in before making the whole thing freely available for public consumption, but if you'd like a copy of it as it is, I'd be happy to send it along with a brief intro on how to use it.
Again, thanks for the mention and the kind words.
Take care.
--michael
I responded to his e-mail and I now have this software in my Inbox - what a guy, eh? Thanks Michael! Now if I can only find the time to experiment and (possibly) implement.
There's a blog over at freeroller.net that is using a slightly altered x2 theme. X stands for XHTML and 2 stands for 2 columns (I contributed this theme to Roller, so that's how I know). Anyway, the writer, kdub, seems to like what I'm serving.
Great stuff from Raible Matt Raible
is a great guy. I have been reading his weblog for a few months and he
has been covering OS X, Roller, Struts, HTML/CSS, and Java which works
well with my tastes. I need to congradulate him on his new daughter!
Thanks for the Abbie love - now it's your turn kdub - tell us about yourself. We want to hear about you, the person, not just your interests.
From my Inbox: We are proud to announce the launch of DMXzone. DMXzone is a merger between UDzone, MXzone and DWzone! This is one of the first HTML-ed e-mails I've received where they used CSS instead of <font> tags everywhere.