Matt RaibleMatt Raible is a writer with a passion for software. Connect with him on LinkedIn.

The Angular Mini-Book The Angular Mini-Book is a guide to getting started with Angular. You'll learn how to develop a bare-bones application, test it, and deploy it. Then you'll move on to adding Bootstrap, Angular Material, continuous integration, and authentication.

Spring Boot is a popular framework for building REST APIs. You'll learn how to integrate Angular with Spring Boot and use security best practices like HTTPS and a content security policy.

For book updates, follow @angular_book on Twitter.

The JHipster Mini-Book The JHipster Mini-Book is a guide to getting started with hip technologies today: Angular, Bootstrap, and Spring Boot. All of these frameworks are wrapped up in an easy-to-use project called JHipster.

This book shows you how to build an app with JHipster, and guides you through the plethora of tools, techniques and options you can use. Furthermore, it explains the UI and API building blocks so you understand the underpinnings of your great application.

For book updates, follow @jhipster-book on Twitter.

10+ YEARS


Over 10 years ago, I wrote my first blog post. Since then, I've authored books, had kids, traveled the world, found Trish and blogged about it all.
You searched this site for "struts". 659 entries found.

You can also try this same search on Google.

Short and sweet contracts

This has been a good month for Raible Designs. Not only did I manage to land a new gig, but I've also had a couple of 1-day contracts. The first one was an architectural review (at the beginning of the month), and yesterday I delivered a presentation on TDD and Spring for a client. These short-n-sweet gigs are a lot of fun. It's a good way to get out and meet members of the Java Community and see what tools they're developing with. The first client is using Struts, Spring and Hibernate. The second client wanted to use Struts, but after my talk, they're thinking about Spring MVC. They plan on using Spring to make EJBs easier, and they're using TopLink on the backend.

The only bad part about yesterday's experience is I developed a full-body ache as soon as I left the client's site. I managed to catch a cold from Abbie this weekend, and that turned into a cold+fever last night. I've had the fever ever since and didn't go into work today. It's really shitty timing for getting sick - we have a deadline on Thursday and we're heading to Oregon to see my parents this weekend. Last I checked, my fever was at 102°F. Hopefully, I'll wake up tomorrow and it'll be gone.

Posted in Java at Jan 25 2005, 08:38:50 PM MST 6 Comments

AppFuse Startup Video?

Dion wants to see an AppFuse Startup Video like Mike Clark's CruiseControl Action Movie. While this sounds like a good idea, I think I'd be shooting myself in the foot if I created it. Why? Because then more folks would start to use AppFuse, and hence, I'd have to answer a lot more e-mails on the mailing list. Being a top-ranked project on java.net doesn't help. You might think that there's a lot of issues with AppFuse, and that's why the mail traffic is so high, but that doesn't seem to be the case. Most questions seem to be along the lines of "Why did you do this?", "What do you think about adding X technology?" or "My Hibernate relationships don't work."

Few of the issues relate to AppFuse directly (i.e. build file and directory structure), but many of them relate to the technologies it depends on. Good HowTos should lead to a lot less Hibernate questions, and I hope to work on that before the next release. As far as the other questions, I need to add some links from the FAQ to the mail archives so I can quite repeating myself. I think a lot of the mail traffic is just an indication of a successful open-source project. In other words, when you get popular - you have little time to develop anymore. I probably spend 1-2 hours per day just answering AppFuse e-mails.

Another unfortunate side-effect of this is that there seems to be a lot of newbies. When AppFuse was first released in April 2003, it seemed that only experienced, smart developers used it. Maybe this was because there wasn't any documentation (besides Pro JSP and Java Development with Ant, which explains the entire build.xml file), so folks had to really understand the dependent technologies to use AppFuse. Now there's questions about the basics of different frameworks. In most cases, I'd like to respond to a link to the framework's documentation - but sometimes the documentation just isn't there. I guess that's why frameworks like Ruby on Rails succeed - all the dependencies are part of the framework. If I tried to do that in the Java Community, it'd be project suicide. I'd spend all day answering questions like, "Why aren't you using Hibernate?", "Why Not Spring/JSF/Struts, etc." Furthermore, I'm not as smart as the framework developers, so it'd simply never happen.

But I digress. What's in it for me if I create an AppFuse Startup Video? I can see what's in it for Mike - his video is about a project he doesn't support (AFAIK) and the video should lead to more book sales. I suppose I could try and hook users that AppFuse is explained in Spring Live, but that's not really the case. Maybe I should just do an Equinox Startup Video. ;-)

Posted in Java at Jan 24 2005, 10:29:12 AM MST 15 Comments

RE: Hype: Ruby on Rails

Patrick thinks that Ruby on Rails is all hype.

Now maybe I'm just a bit biased since my framework isn't getting all the slashdotters oohing and awwing over it, but I think Ruby on Rails is way over hyped. The tutorial here is great and gave me a very good overview of what it does. At the end of the day, RoR is simply a RESTful CRUD framework.

I'd like to agree with Patrick, because that is my natural tendency when I see a project that everyone praises. But I know better. I think it's better not to speculate on the productivity or usefulness of a framework until you've used it to develop an app.

That's what I did with Spring, WebWork, Tapestry and JSF last year. Now I feel like I know "the truth" and whether one framework is better than the other. The truth is they all have strengths and they all have weaknesses. While one might work well for one project, it might not for the next. I think the best thing is that you don't setup yourself for framework lock-in. If you only know one web framework for Java, you should probably pick up a book and develop an app with another framework - just to see how things are done differently. Now that I've used all of the Big 5 in Java, I don't think it would be that hard to migrate an app from one framework to next.

So what am I trying to say? Don't bash on a framework until you've tried it. And I don't mean toying around with it on a Tuesday night, I mean using it for a real-world project. I'll probably diving in and doing a little Rails development later this year. Why? So I can see if all the hype is accurate. ;-)

Posted in Java at Jan 21 2005, 01:40:37 PM MST 8 Comments

Using JasperReports with AppFuse and Spring

In Spring 1.1.3, support was added for using JasperReports with Spring MVC. Today, Gregory Beumer posted a nice overview of JasperReports. This inspired me to dig up Gilberto's post on How to integrate JasperReports with AppFuse. If you're looking for a reporting solution in your AppFuse-based application, and you're using Spring MVC ... enjoy! I plan on adding this to the wiki in the future, along with howtos for integrating JasperReports with Struts, WebWork, JSF and Tapestry. If you happen to know of tutorials for integrating JasperReports with these other frameworks, please let me know.

Posted in Java at Jan 20 2005, 08:12:04 AM MST 17 Comments

Installing Jetspeed 2 and deploying Struts/JSF Portlets

One of things we're moving to on my current project is portlet development. The client has a bunch of apps they want developed and it makes a lot of sense to develop them as portlets and deploy them in a portlet container. Because of this, we spent some time this week mucking around with Jetspeed-2. Bruce and I figured out how to install it, and then I did a bit of work with Equinox to deploy the Struts and JSF versions as portlets.

I didn't get equinox-struts or equinox-jsf fully functioning in Jetspeed, but I did get them to deploy and bring up the first page. I expect to do some more work in the next month to get these apps fully functional. In the meantime, I've put together the following tutorials.

If you have any tips on getting JSF or Struts WARs working in Jetspeed, please let me know.

Posted in Java at Jan 13 2005, 08:44:53 PM MST 10 Comments

[DJUG] Testing and Handling Exceptions in the Web Tier

I'm attending Denver's JUG tonight, where Scott Davis is talking about Unit Testing the Web Tier. His opening slide says he's going to cover HttpUnit, Canoo WebTest and JMeter. I'm most interested in the JMeter stuff as I've been meaning to integrate it into AppFuse. I've used HttpUnit and it's a little verbose for me. I prefer using Canoo WebTest or jWebUnit over HttpUnit. On my current project, we're considering using jWebUnit or HttpUnit to act as a browser when interacting with a 3rd-party system.

All of these tools run functional tests - which are much different from unit tests. Unit tests usually tests the bricks, whereas functional tests test the building. For unit and functional tests to be truly effective, they must be:

  • Scriptable
  • Repeatable
  • Automated
  • Darn close to 100% coverage

The tools Scott is talking about tonight have passed his basic tests:

  • Can I learn it in 10 minutes?
  • Does it play nicely with my existing test environment?
  • Does it play nicely with my existing production environment?

I didn't take any notes about HttpUnit or Canoo WebTest because I didn't really learn anything new. Scott did do a nice job in his HttpUnit examples - he made it look a lot simpler than I've previously seen. I've used it HttpUnit before and it seems a bit verbose. I've always used jWebUnit, which simplifies HttpUnit's API.

JMeter allows you to do the same thing as HttpUnit and Canoo WebTest. It's a standalone GUI, for the complete non-programmer. It does not plug into Ant/JUnit and is mostly used for load testing. I thought it was exclusively used for load testing - and I think it has an Ant task. I could be wrong.

<sidenote>Scott uses Smultron for XML editing on his Mac.</sidenote>

The basic building block of JMeter is a "Thread Group". The Thread Group allows you to control the number of users/threads that run a particular test. You can test gets, posts, change the protocol and even upload files. For load testing, make sure and check "Retrieve all Embedded objects in HTML files". You have to view the "result windows" to view that your tests actually ran - there's no "green bar" feature.

I think JMeter has improved a lot since I last looked at it. Scott's overview and demonstration make it look very straight forward and easy to use. One guy asked if it's possible to see a a global view of all tests run. Scott thinks it's possible by adding a Listener to the Thread Group and creating a graph (one of the options). Scott is now showing a lot of the options in JMeter - there's a ton! It's almost overwhelming.

Next up is "Exceptional" Web Apps by Stephen A. Stelting, a senior Instructor and Author from Sun. His latest book is "Robust Java". Stephen has spent the last year and 1/2 figuring out how to make Java fail.

Objectives:

  • Describe the types of errors that occur in the web
  • Explain how exceptions and errors can be handled
  • Describe the web container response to exceptions
  • Present best practices to address web tier exceptions
  • Show how web frameworks handle exceptions

Payoff: As a result of this talk, you'll have a better understanding of how to use exceptions in Servlets and JSPs, improving the robustness of your webapps.

I'm a little skeptical at this point. I think most folks don't do exception handling in their webapps. I hope Stephen has some good tips and tricks for those of us who are familiar with handling exceptions. I wonder how he feels about Spring and its runtime exceptions?

There are two types of exceptions in the web tier: HTTP Errors and Java Exceptions. Standard HTTP Errors are handled by the web server. You can also send your own HTTP errors by calling HttpServletResponse.sendError(). If you're using response.sendError(), make sure and call it before you commit the output. The web.xml file allows you to specify errors and exceptions with the <error-page> element.

Servlets and Filters have similar exception behavior. Both declare exceptions in both of their lifecycle methods: init and service (doFilter for Filters). Developers throw exceptions in lifecycle methods to "tell" the container about problems.

  • javax.servlet.ServletException
  • javax.servlet.UnavailableException
  • java.io.IOException

Stephen is now describing the init() method and the exceptions it can throw. Yawn. I think most Java web developers use frameworks these days. Because of this, most developers probably don't use these methods because they don't write plain ol' servlets. One thing I didn't know is that UnavailableException takes a time parameter - if you throw an UnavailableException with this parameter, the container will retry after the specified amount of time.

Result of Exceptions in init(): The destroy() method is never called, since the initialization did not complete. Client calls during component unavailability render a 500 error.

I stopped taking notes at this point because my laptop battery was dying. I didn't really learn much in the rest of the presentation. While I can appreciate Stephen's enthusiasm, it was obvious that he was an instructor and not an in-the-trenches developer. He explained a lot of what and didn't have any code to show how to do stuff. There wasn't a single demo in the entire presentation.

Most of the exception handling stuff Stephen talked about for the rest of the session was common sense (IMO). It also centered around the Servlet and JSP API, which most folks probably don't mess with. The Struts and JSF coverage at the end was cool. If nothing else, it was to nice to hear a Sun employee confirm that JSF is quite deficient in its hooks to allow easy framework-configurable exception handling.

Now that I'm working at home, and working/interacting with friends all day - it seems that the DJUG meetings aren't as exciting. They used to be fun because I could get out of the house and have a few beers with friends. Maybe it was the lack of learning anything new tonight.

Posted in Java at Jan 12 2005, 11:30:50 PM MST 3 Comments

How do you become an independent consultant and get contracts?

A friend recently sent me an e-mail looking for advice on becoming an independent consultant and specifically how to get contracts. I thought this advice might be interesting for others. The e-mail below is unmodified for the most part. He's an animator and does a lot of stuff in Flash, so this naturally has that twist to it. For Java Developers, just replace Macromedia/Flash stuff with Java stuff.

The best thing is to subcribe to the job mailing lists in Denver. There's a Rocky Mountain Internet Users Group and Macromedia Users group that would probably help you.

http://www.rmiug.org/html/email_lists.html

http://www.rm3ug.com

Then I would advise you to get involved in with a local user group, like the Macromedia one. Attend meetings, talk to people, see where they're getting their gigs. I go to the Denver Java Users Group on a monthly basis and now I have a lot of friends there. It was nerdy at first, but then I realized they all went out for beers afterwards and it's kinda cool now. If you volunteer to speak at one of the meetings, you'll probably get some leads from that. It's really all about networking.

The best thing you could possibly do for you career and new clients is to start a weblog. On it you can talk about what you do and how you solve problems. Tips and tricks kinda stuff. I put a lot of personal stuff on mine (www.raibledesigns.com) too. Ever since I started my weblog, I haven't had to do much looking. Often, I can just post I'm looking for a new gig and I'll get offers. I get 8000 visitors a day and around 2 million hits a month. It's the main reason I got my last couple of book deals.

Any other advice you might have for people looking to become independent consultants?

In general, I find independent consulting a lot more fun than full-time employment. The main benefits of full-time employment are Health Insurance and 401K Plans. Stock options are not a benefit in my eyes. I've yet to meet anyone who has made money off stock options as a full-time employee.

The main benefits of being an independent consultant are higher pay and freedom. An experience full-time Java Developer (in Denver) makes around $100K year. I've heard of companies hiring employees for $120K, but the most I've known anyone to make is $108K. On other hand, a contractor with only a year or two of experience can easily make $55/hour - or $110K year. Experienced developers get anywhere from $75/hour to $200/hour. That's right folks - $150K year to $400K year! For the higher dollars you often have to travel, which kinda sucks.

People that are full-time employees often like it for the benefits - health care and such. As a consultant, you get to see how screwed up our health care system is and pay for your health insurance out-of-pocket. I've seen folks pay anywhere from $250/month to $1000/month for health insurance. We've done both (the latter thanks to Corba) and I'm happy to say that we're paying $250/month now. United Healthcare, minimal plan - but we're still insured. What about 401K? As an independent, you often will establish your own company, and then you can contribute to an SEP plan. With a 401K, you're limited to contributing something like $15K/year. With an SEP, you can contribute up to $40K! Granted, you won't have any employer matching, but you can still plan for your retirement.

The one downside I've seen personally from being independent is I tend to find a lot of projects where I'm the development team. This is great at first since I can work remotely and don't have to attend any meetings, but I tend to miss the water-cooler talk and synergy that a team provides. With full-time positions, this can happen too, but it's rare. With full-time positions, you're likely part of a development team - and if you're lucky - one full of smart developers. One myth about contractors is that they often don't fit into a team full of full-time employees. Personally, I've found this to be a personality thing and have rarely had issues fitting in with full-time employees. The ideal situation is simply to work with smart people. In my career, working with people smarter than me has always been very lucrative to my knowledge base.

Working from home is not all it's cracked up to be. I've done it off and on for a few years now and I'd much rather go into an office at this point. When I work from home, dinner tends to be a just a "break" in my day and I go back to work after the kids go to bed. When I'm in an office, the work day ends when you leave. So how do you get the team-benefits as a independent consultant? The best way I've found is to work with a group of consultants on a project - where the whole team is contractors. You'll often share the same lifestyle and attitudes about your careers. Also, a lot of independent consultants tend to be smart - so you get that benefit.

The last thing I like about independent consulting is freedom. I had 4 months last year where I attended conferences, went on vacation or worked on Spring Live. Good luck finding that kind of freedom with a full-time gig. The higher rates allow you to take more time off to spend with your family - or just enjoy life in general.

If you're thinking about becoming an independent consultant, now is a better time than ever - especially if you live in Denver. The Denver JUG mailing list received more job postings last year than any previous year. From what I've seen, at least half of these are for contracting positions. Unfortunately, most of them are in the $40-60/hour range, but that's still good money.

Any feedback on why you think being a full-time employee is better is most welcome.

Posted in Java at Jan 05 2005, 04:45:14 PM MST 25 Comments

[ANN] Equinox 1.2 Released

This release adds support for iBATIS, JDO (JPOX), Spring JDBC and OJB. For detailed documentation on how to use these frameworks with Spring, see Chapter 7 of Spring Live or the Spring Reference Documentation.

For a detailed comparison of the web frameworks included in Equinox, see Chapter 11 of Spring Live (to be released in mid January 2005). Detailed release notes are below:

- Added CruiseControl files and documentation to extras/cruisecontrol.
- Fixed export issue in userList.jsp for displaytag. Birthday should now export w/o any issues.
- Added deployment descriptor for Geronimo with Jetty.
- Added JUnit and UI tests for JSF and Tapestry.
- Added installations for Velocity and FreeMarker with Spring MVC.
- Added installations for iBATIS, JDO, OBJ and Spring JDBC. Hibernate is the default.
- Dependent packages upgraded:

  • Cargo 0.4
  • DisplayTag 1.0 RC2
  • Hibernate 2.1.6
  • Spring 1.1.3
  • StrutsTestCase 2.1.3

- Dependent packages added:

  • FreeMarker 2.3
  • iBATIS 2.0.8
  • JPOX 1.1.0-alpha-4
  • OJB 1.0.1
  • Url Rewrite Filter 1.2
  • Velocity 1.4

Download. For more information about installing the various options, see the README.txt file.

Demos are available at the links below:

NOTE: I didn't upgrade to Hibernate 2.1.7 because it doesn't create the HSQLDB database tables when the JVM starts up.

Posted in Java at Dec 29 2004, 11:49:15 AM MST 1 Comment

If you could add another framework to AppFuse, which would it be?

If you could add another web framework option to AppFuse, which one would it be and why? Please keep in mind it already includes Struts, Spring, WebWork, JSF and Tapestry.

Posted in Java at Dec 13 2004, 09:52:17 PM MST 38 Comments

Can you test all of AppFuse?

I'll admit, it's time for me to get a G5. I can no longer test everything in AppFuse in one fell swoop. When I try to run this Ant build file(info) (which I'd like to use with CruiseControl) on my Mac and Linux machines, I get OutOfMemory errors. My PowerBook has ANT_OPTS set to "-Xmx768m" and my Fedora Core 3 box has it set to "-Xms1024M -Xmx1024M". Both machines have 1 GB of RAM. The build dies a lot sooner on Linux (15 minutes), and the PowerBook gets really close to finishing (42 minutes). I'm guessing all the tests would take about 50 minutes on the PowerBook. There are currently 21 AppFuse combinations tested by this script. Spring is used in all of these, so I've eliminated that as a listed option.

NOTE: If you're trying this on Windows, remove the "fixcrlf" call at the beginning of the "test" target.

  1. Struts + Hibernate
  2. Struts + Hibernate and iBATIS
  3. Struts + iBATIS
  4. Struts with AppGen - Generic
  5. Struts with AppGen - Detailed
  6. Spring MVC + Hibernate
  7. Spring MVC + iBATIS
  8. Spring MVC with AppGen - Generic
  9. Spring MVC with AppGen - Detailed
  10. WebWork + Hibernate
  11. WebWork + iBATIS
  12. WebWork with AppGen - Generic
  13. WebWork with AppGen - Detailed
  14. JSF + Hibernate
  15. JSF + iBATIS
  16. JSF with AppGen - Generic
  17. JSF with AppGen - Detailed
  18. Tapestry + Hibernate
  19. Tapestry + iBATIS
  20. Tapestry with AppGen - Generic
  21. Tapestry with AppGen - Detailed

So, the question is - can your machine run all the tests for AppFuse? If so, let me know your specs. I'd love to get this setup for CruiseControl, but if I can't even run it with Ant, I doubt CruiseControl will be any better. I realize I could split things up, but I prefer to have one build file.

Posted in Java at Dec 10 2004, 08:51:02 AM MST 8 Comments